MicroStrategy vs Tableau: Which BI Software Is the Winner?

2 comments
Last Reviewed:

According to 6sense, Tableau claims a 15.03% share in the BI market, while MicroStrategy carries 1.53%. That’s a large gap, and yet MicroStrategy emerges as a Tableau competitor in big data analytics.

This article intends to support your BI software search with a MicroStrategy vs. Tableau comparison. As Tableau comes out on top, it’s worth diving into the details.

Get our BI Tools Requirements Template

Microstrategy vs Tableau Comparative Guide

Article Roadmap

Another website, Enlyft, says that among organizations using MicroStrategy, 37% are small, 18% mid-sized and 38% are large companies with revenue over $1000 million. These statistics indicate the platform is scalable and robust.

Whether it can dethrone Tableau as a leading analytics platform remains to be seen.

MicroStrategy vs. Tableau Overview

Before we jump into the details, here’s an at-a-glance look at the contenders.

Product MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Rating 75 80
User Sentiment Score 82% 87%
Free Trial Limited to retail analytics Yes
Deployment Cloud and on-premise Cloud and on-premise

Company Size M S M L
Starting Price Still gathering data $15 per user monthly

Feature Comparison

This section includes a brief discussion of their functional and technical capabilities unlocked from our JumpStart Platform for you.

Microstrategy vs Tableau Capabilities Overview

Streamline Software Selection with Services

Data Source Connectivity

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 78/100 Analyst Score: 80/100
Winner: Tableau wins in this category for extensibility, being open to more partner integrations.

One difference between MicroStrategy and Tableau is support for business applications.

MicroStrategy Tableau
Fully Supported Platforms
  • Big data platforms
  • Cloud storage solutions
Moderately Supported Systems
Partner Integrations
  • Accounting platforms
  • Customer success tools
  • Ecommerce systems
  • ERP software
  • Payment processing platforms

Advanced Analytics

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 69/100 Analyst Score: 75/100
Winner: Tableau wins with complete out-of-the-box support for advanced analytics techniques.

Both tools use R and Python libraries for advanced analytics and data visualization.

MicroStrategy offers many statistical functions, including mean, median, mode, sum and average. Despite large volumes, it enables you to discover valuable patterns and associations with clustering techniques. Cohort and segmentation analysis are available.

Regression analysis can help identify the factors affecting particular outcomes. You can tweak these to get the desired results. When applied to strategies, it can lead to project success.

MicroStrategy supports PMML. If you’re working on another application, importing data models into MicroStrategy allows you to get the most out of both applications. Similarly, you can export models you build in MicroStrategy.

MicroStrategy Python Integration

Python integrations enable workflow automation in MicroStrategy. Source

Tableau also uses Python and R scripts for calculations and data aggregation. Analyzing sentiment is possible by developing custom functionality on top of the platform. Date-time functions and algorithms for forecasting are available.

Dashboarding and Data Visualization

MicroStrategyTableauAnalyst Score: 94/100Analyst Score: 100/100Winner: Tableau wins this category with robust source connectivity and graphical capabilities.

According to our analyst research, there’s not much difference between Tableau and MicroStrategy regarding visualization.

MicroStrategy dashboards are called dossiers and, much like folders, can accommodate multiple pages. You can include charts and graphs, drill down into data, sort it as desired and highlight the points of interest. Dossiers are shareable and collaborative.

The platform supports advanced visualization libraries, including matplotlib, seaborn, plotly and ggplot2.

  • The platform is open to embedding, so you don’t have to switch between regular workflows and data views. Your metrics are available whenever you work.
  • Branding gives your dashboards a professional look and your users a familiar experience.
  • Animations show changes over time or across groups.
Tableau ShowMe Feature

Tableau’s Show Me feature speeds up chart building and analysis. Source

When using Tableau, R and Python libraries work behind the scenes as a friendly interface hides the scripts.

  • Animations are available, and you can ask the system to explain what you see using its Show Me feature.
  • Tableau makes the latest data available, either as a snapshot from the source, via auto-refresh or through a direct source connection.
  • You can personalize dashboards with your brand’s logo and layout. Interactivity is available with filters, highlights and tooltips.

Compare MicroStrategy and Tableau Against Your Needs

Data Management

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 100/100 Analyst Score: 100/100
Winner: It’s a tie between MicroStrategy and Tableau.

Data management is an umbrella term for many critical processes, including data preparation, blending, governance and quality management.

With MicroStrategy, you can connect to sources with simple screen actions and build custom views. Arranging data, joining tables and labeling datasets is a matter of a few clicks of your mouse. Multi-dimensional analysis, including OLAP, is possible.

Data Management with Tableau Prep Builder

Blend, shape and cleanse your data faster with Tableau Prep Builder. Source

One difference between MicroStrategy and Tableau is that Tableau is primarily a data visualization tool. It relies on Tableau Prep, available with the Creator license, for data preparation, cleaning and mapping. Data exploration and highlighting are possible.

Tableau offers three levels of data control — central, delegated and self-governed.

Admins manage global data access and security policies. Specific users have permission to manage data for certain areas. Individual users can control their own data within designated parameters.

Data Querying

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 72/100 Analyst Score: 99/100
Winner: Tableau scores over MicroStrategy with a native visual query language, VizQL.

MicroStrategy supports complex queries and subqueries. You can connect a project to multiple sources, freeform SQL, Query Builder and MDX cube reports. A visual interface makes SQL querying easier.

You can get fast performance with in-memory computing using partitions and parallel processing.

Direct data access allows connecting to sources in real time while building dashboards. It involves fetching only the desired data, which means more frequent queries.

This process can impact performance and is, sadly, limited to one source at a time.

VizQL Data Querying and Visualization

VizQL works behind the scenes for intuitive querying and visualization. Source

VizQL flattens the learning curve to some extent with a user-friendly interface. Drag-and-drop and click-and-select features make it accessible to newbies and power users.

You can build custom queries with SQL and pull data from many sources in one workbook. Automating data refresh jobs can save time and keep you updated with the latest data. Tableau can process a report in parallel by splitting it into smaller reports.

Embedded Analytics

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 62/100 Analyst Score: 91/100
Winner: Tableau offers better embedding with OOTB (out-of-the-box) multi-tenancy and triggering workflows in the embedding application.

MicroStrategy embeds into websites and portals as a platform, or you can insert a specific visualization. The vendor supports white labeling, and dashboard branding is possible.

MicroStrategy supports multiple tenants while keeping their workspaces and data separate. You can change existing data, add new information and view the latest reports on the mobile app. Database write-backs are possible from mobile devices.

Tableau Embedded Analytics

The MicroStrategy vs. Tableau comparison sees Tableau score a win for embedded. Source

Like MicroStrategy, Tableau can cater to several clients at a time with separate workspaces and folders. Administrators can set up user permissions.

Using webhooks, Tableau can trigger workflows in the host application. You can modify orders in your procurement software from Tableau. Or update customer records in your CRM tools with the latest data.

The platform is open to write-backs using client-side extensions. White labeling is available, and the parallel processing of large reports is possible.

Tableau doesn’t offer write-back by default, but there are workarounds.

Compare MicroStrategy and Tableau Against Your Needs

Mobile BI

A Tableau vs. MicroStrategy comparison must include their mobile capabilities.

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 91/100 Analyst Score: 71/100
Winner: MicroStrategy wins for mobile insights with excellent collaboration features and location data analysis.

MicroStrategy’s mobile app is available on Android and iOS devices and works with device cameras, sensors, GPS and notifications.

Reports fit to the screen when you view them on mobile. Similar to the desktop, you can interact with data and set up searches, lists, filters and charts.

  • Team collaboration is possible with freehand shape drawing, comments and report sharing.
  • You can view location data with ESRI and Google Maps.
  • It supports offline mode and barcode readers.

Tableau is available on mobile, but you need a Tableau Server or Online account. You can search, scroll, pan, and zoom in and out.

Offline access is available, though you can view only local reports. Interactivity is available. You can subscribe to mobile alerts.

Reporting

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 82/100 Analyst Score: 93/100
Winner: Tableau wins for robust reporting and more intuitive subscription options for viewing reports.

Though MicroStrategy supports advanced capabilities, the vendor makes reporting intuitive for non-technical users with drag-and-drop and direct SQL querying.

A free-form report builder provides creative freedom. You can interact with data, highlight datasets and set up alerts. Voice-generated reports are available, thanks to Alexa and Google Home.Object-level security is possible in shared reports.

MicroStrategy Reporting

A MicroStrategy dossier shows two visualizations filtered by category and region. Source

Tableau requires legwork before you can get started with reporting. You need editor permissions to generate reports. Plus, the data should be on the Tableau Server beforehand, even for ad hoc reports.

Your users can subscribe to email updates if they don’t have a Tableau Server/Online subscription.

Built-in alerts and conditional formatting are available. The platform supports report sharing and version control.

Security

MicroStrategy Tableau
Analyst Score: 95/100 Analyst Score: 69/100
Winner: MicroStrategy wins this comparison with a dedicated server and a module for logging and analyzing usage.

MicroStrategy’s Intelligence Server logs activity and performance. An Enterprise Manager produces reports after analyzing this data. Annual security checkups include external audits and penetration tests.

The vendor resolves issues as a priority and ensures retesting after each set of fixes. On Windows, the platform supports single sign-on. Data encryption and object, row and column-level security are available.

MicroStrategy Platform Analytics

Platform analytics in MicroStrategy provides app usage and performance data. Source

Tableau tracks activity and content usage for troubleshooting. Additionally, these logs help in compliance reporting. The system secures data at the object, row and column level. Data at rest is available, and SSO ensures easy switching between applications.

Which BI Tool Wins?

In this Tableau vs. MicroStrategy comparison, Tableau wins, leading in six out of nine categories. And it’s expected, as Tableau focuses on user-friendliness with its easy-to-build visualizations.

At the same time, it has powerful features to serve data-savvy users. It scores for

  • Data source connectivity,
  • Advanced analytics
  • Dashboarding and data visualization
  • Data querying
  • Embedded analytics
  • Reporting

MicroStrategy leads for data security and mobile BI.

Interestingly, the two tie for data management, a crucial deciding factor in software procurement.

Your users’ mindset, technical skills and openness to new tech should be critical deciding factors when buying software. How do you balance them with functional and technical requirements? Follow our Lean Selection Methodology to learn more.

Get our BI Tools Requirements Template

Next Steps

If you found this discussion helpful, get our free comparison report to analyze your preferred software by feature. A tabular format shows the winners and laggards with detailed feature descriptions and scores.

Compare up to five products at a time and run the report as many times as you want.

Did you find value in this MicroStrategy vs. Tableau comparison? Which products have you used for business intelligence? Let us know in the comments below.

Top Competitors

Birst BI
License Cost: $30,000/year for 20 users
Dundas BI
Starting at $6 per user per month
Oracle BI
Starting at $350/named user and $77 for software update license and support
QlikView
Personal Edition is free. Named User License starts at $1,350 per named user
SAS Visual Analytics
Starting at $1,365/month
Sisense
Starting at $21,000/year for 5 users
Cognos Analytics
Starting at $75 per user per month
Power BI
Power BI Desktop is free. Paid versions start at $9.99 per user per month
BusinessObjects
Starting from $55,000 per year
Ritinder KaurMicroStrategy vs Tableau: Which BI Software Is the Winner?

2 comments

Join the conversation
  • Jeff - September 19, 2024 reply

    Kinda disagree with data query and embedding scores. MicroStrategy has a SQL engine and can generate advanced SQL. Also, the data size it can handle is about 100 times that of Tableau and performs better with C as the main code, instead of Java. And the metadata size is also, 00s times more manageable than Tableau.

  • Possum Jones - April 13, 2017 reply

    idk when this article was written, but it seems to be right on the money whether it was 2007 or 2017.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *