Our analysts compared Duro PLM vs SAP PLM based on data from our 400+ point analysis of PLM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all PLM Software
SAP PLM has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 77% when considering 81 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Recent user reviews of Duro PLM highlight its strengths in user-friendliness and streamlining core product lifecycle management (PLM) tasks. Praises center on improved collaboration between engineering and non-engineering teams due to Duro's centralized data repository. This fosters clear communication and reduces errors that can stem from information silos. For instance, imagine an engineer making a design change that's instantly reflected for manufacturing, preventing the production of outdated parts. Additionally, users appreciate Duro's ability to automate data entry and enforce revision control, minimizing the risk of errors that can cost companies time and money. One reviewer mentioned the frustration of accidentally using an outdated bill of materials in another system, leading to incorrect parts being ordered – a mishap Duro's features help to avoid. However, some users felt Duro lacked the advanced features and customization options found in more established PLM solutions. This can be a concern for businesses with complex product development processes or highly specific industry requirements. For example, a company developing medical devices might require robust compliance features beyond Duro's current offerings. Additionally, Duro's scalability has raised questions, with some users concerned about its suitability for very large teams managing intricate product lines. Imagine an aerospace company struggling to manage hundreds of users and complex data within Duro's framework. In conclusion, Duro PLM appears well-suited for smaller companies or startups that prioritize ease of use, clear communication, and efficient workflows. Its strength lies in streamlining core PLM tasks and facilitating collaboration across teams. However, businesses with highly specialized needs or very large user bases might find Duro limiting. Ultimately, the best fit depends on the specific needs and complexities of a company's product development process.
SAP PLM is a popular PLM software that has received mixed reviews from users in the last year. Many users praise its powerful features and integration with other SAP products, but some find it complex and expensive. One of the main strengths of SAP PLM is its ability to manage complex product lifecycles, including engineering, manufacturing, and service. It also offers a wide range of features for managing product data, such as CAD integration, bill of materials management, and change management. SAP PLM is well-integrated with other SAP products, such as SAP ERP and SAP CRM, which can provide users with a single view of their product data across the entire enterprise. However, SAP PLM can be complex and expensive to implement, and some users find it difficult to use. It is important to note that SAP PLM is best suited for large enterprises with complex product lifecycles. Smaller businesses may find it too expensive and complex for their needs. In comparison to similar products, SAP PLM is a more comprehensive and feature-rich solution. However, it is also more expensive and complex than some of its competitors. One of the key differentiating factors of SAP PLM is its ability to manage complex product lifecycles. It also offers a wide range of features for managing product data, such as CAD integration, bill of materials management, and change management. SAP PLM is well-integrated with other SAP products, such as SAP ERP and SAP CRM, which can provide users with a single view of their product data across the entire enterprise. Overall, SAP PLM is a powerful and comprehensive PLM software that is best suited for large enterprises with complex product lifecycles. However, it is important to note that SAP PLM can be complex and expensive to implement, and some users find it difficult to use. Smaller businesses may find it too expensive and complex for their needs.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...