Looking for alternatives to Waystar? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Claims Management, Insurance Payments Management, and Medical Coding. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Medical Billing Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Waystar to leading industry alternatives like Tebra Managed Billing, TriZetto, Healthpac, and Therabill.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Waystar (formerly Navicure or ZirMed) is a cloud-based solution for managing a health organization’s revenue cycle. Over 25,000 hospital organizations and health clinics use this system to track patients' revenue from their first visit until their final balance has been paid.
It’s ideal for health care organizations of all sizes. It helps providers get paid faster and more accurately by automating tedious billing tasks, improving claim accuracy and offering in-depth reporting tools that uncover areas for efficiency gains.
Popular features include eligibility checks, claims submission and tracking, denial management, and analytics dashboards.
Users praise Waystar for its user-friendly design, ability to reduce billing errors, and seamless integration with other practice management systems.
While pricing varies based on factors like practice size and specific feature sets, the vendor offers a subscription model with fees based on metrics like claim volume.
Therabill, a web-based medical billing software developed by WebPT, is designed to enhance clinic efficiency and profitability by streamlining the billing process and minimizing errors. This software is particularly well-suited for businesses in the healthcare industry that need to manage their medical billing processes effectively. Therabill offers a range of benefits, such as automating medical billing tasks, reducing administrative costs, improving patient satisfaction, and ensuring compliance with regulations.
The software boasts a user-friendly interface, integrates with various systems, provides robust reporting capabilities, and offers dedicated customer support. User experiences indicate that Therabill is easy to use, efficient, and effective, with particular praise for its customer support team. Pricing for Therabill falls within the mid-range for medical billing software and is typically based on factors such as the number of users or the size of the practice.
among all Medical Billing Software
Waystar has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 315 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Tebra Managed Billing has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 80% when considering 629 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
TriZetto has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 83% when considering 21 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Healthpac has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 100% when considering 11 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Therabill has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 83% when considering 77 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Waystar's core strength lies in its ability to automate repetitive, error-prone tasks within RCM. This can free up significant staff time for higher-value work, and reduce costly mistakes that lead to denials or missed revenue. Additionally, analytics tools appear robust, providing insights that can drive better decision-making around process improvement and resource allocation.However, smaller practices may find the cost and complexity prohibitive. Additionally, like any cloud-based system, maximizing Waystar's value will require ongoing training and attention to updates.
Tebra Managed Billing offers robust functionality for scheduling patients, confirming insurance, managing accounts, storing patient documents and more. It’s user-friendly interface and intuitive options make it easy to use and navigate, increasing productivity. Reporting tool offers easy customization for businesses needs. Reviewers said that customer support is responsive and helpful in solving issues. However, some complained that getting customer service was challenging. Setting up patient billing and insurance was difficult and negatively impacted workflow. Users disliked that the system tended to run slow and was often down for repairs or maintenance.
TriZetto garners praise for its comprehensive suite of features that streamline medical billing processes, from patient registration and insurance verification to claim submission and payment processing. Users appreciate its ability to automate tasks, reducing manual effort and the potential for errors. The software's scalability makes it suitable for healthcare organizations of all sizes, accommodating the needs of both small practices and large enterprises. Additionally, TriZetto's analytics and insights empower healthcare professionals to make data-driven decisions, improving patient care and optimizing revenue cycles. However, some users note that TriZetto's robust functionality comes at a cost, as it can be more expensive than some competing solutions. The software's complexity may also present a learning curve for new users, requiring additional training and support. Despite these drawbacks, TriZetto remains a popular choice for healthcare organizations seeking a comprehensive and scalable medical billing solution. Its ability to automate tasks, improve efficiency, and provide valuable insights makes it particularly well-suited for large organizations with complex billing needs.
Is Healthpac the right prescription for your medical practice's billing woes? User reviews suggest that Healthpac, now known as i3 Verticals Healthcare, is a solid choice for medical billing companies and practices, especially those seeking a user-friendly and intuitive solution. Healthpac's strengths lie in its ease of use, requiring minimal training for implementation. Users praise its comprehensive features, including claim management, invoice history, remittance advice, and payment processing, which streamline billing processes and enhance cash flow. The software's ability to generate online claims and patient records further simplifies operations. However, some users have expressed concerns about the software's lack of advanced features, such as robust reporting and analytics, which may be a drawback for larger practices or those seeking more in-depth data insights. Despite these limitations, Healthpac's user-friendliness and comprehensive features make it a suitable choice for smaller practices and billing companies that prioritize simplicity and efficiency.
Therabill has garnered a mixed bag of reviews over the past year, with users highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses. On the plus side, Therabill receives kudos for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it a breeze for navigating the complexities of medical billing. Users also appreciate its robust reporting features, which provide valuable insights into practice performance and financial health. Additionally, Therabill's integration with other healthcare platforms streamlines workflows and enhances efficiency. However, some users have expressed concerns about occasional software glitches and limitations in customization options. Therabill's customer support has also received mixed feedback, with some users experiencing long wait times and inconsistent service. Compared to competitors like Kareo and SimplePractice, Therabill stands out for its affordability and specialized focus on therapy practices. Ultimately, Therabill is best suited for small to medium-sized therapy practices seeking a user-friendly and cost-effective solution for managing their billing needs. Larger practices or those requiring extensive customization may need to explore alternative options. Keep in mind that software is constantly evolving, so it's always a good idea to check for the latest updates and user reviews before making a decision.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...