Our analysts compared WebAssign vs TOPYX based on data from our 400+ point analysis of LMS Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all LMS Software
WebAssign has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 73% when considering 29 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
TOPYX has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 17 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Let's *assign* ourselves the task of dissecting WebAssign's user feedback. WebAssign garners mixed reviews, with a recurring theme of it being a powerful tool when it works as intended, but frustrating when technical issues arise. Users appreciate the extensive library of pre-built questions and assignments, saving instructors valuable time. The automatic grading feature is a major plus, especially for large classes, but several users report grading inconsistencies and errors that require manual intervention. WebAssign's integration with learning management systems (LMS) like Blackboard and Canvas is a significant advantage, streamlining workflow for educators. However, the user interface is often criticized for being clunky and outdated, leading to a steep learning curve for both instructors and students. Some users find the platform's customization options limiting, hindering their ability to tailor assignments to specific needs. Cost is another concern, with some institutions finding it to be a pricey option compared to competitors like Pearson's MyLab or WileyPLUS. WebAssign seems best suited for large STEM courses where automatic grading and a vast question bank are priorities, but instructors should be prepared to invest time in learning the platform and troubleshooting potential technical glitches. For smaller courses or those in non-STEM fields, the cost and complexity might outweigh the benefits, making alternative platforms worth exploring.
TOPYX is an LMS and talent management system with multiple HR functions. Users loved the pricing scheme, which has a fixed cost instead of a per-user model that many found affordable. Overall, they found customer service to be friendly and helpful and appreciated the fact that the system was easy to use and learn. Users had heavy issues with the app in the comments on Google Play. The most common complaint was being able to log in and stay that way. Reviewers also had issues with the system remembering and using the correct URL. Several said they used the correct URL and it still wouldn’t work. This platform may be a good option for small and medium-sized companies and institutions. As stated above, there aren’t many reviews of it. Therefore, demo extensively and double-check it has the necessary requirements during the buying process.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...