Our analysts compared ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Cisco Vulnerability Management based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Vulnerability Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Vulnerability Management Software
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Patch Management.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Cisco Vulnerability Management and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Integrations.
Is ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus a plus for your organization, or does it lack the managerial skills to get the job done? User reviews from the last year paint a largely positive picture of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, particularly when compared to competitors like Qualys VMDR. Users consistently praise its comprehensive vulnerability management features, including automated scanning, prioritization, and robust reporting, all at a price point that's music to any IT budget's ears. One user even went so far as to call it "quite cheap" compared to other tools. This affordability, coupled with its multi-OS support and integration capabilities, makes it a compelling choice for organizations looking for a one-stop shop to bolster their security posture. However, no software is without its flaws. Some users have pointed out that ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus could benefit from improved patch deployment workflows and more user-friendly reporting customization options. While the software's interface is generally well-regarded, one user critique highlighted the need for a more modern and intuitive design, suggesting that the current interface feels a tad outdated in our age of sleek and customizable user experiences. Overall, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus emerges as a robust and cost-effective solution, particularly well-suited for organizations seeking to level up their vulnerability management game without breaking the bank. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive feature set, ease of use, and affordability, making it a practical choice for businesses of all sizes looking to stay ahead of the ever-evolving threat landscape.
Can Cisco Vulnerability Management mend your security woes? User reviews from the past year suggest it might just be the ticket, especially for Cisco-centric environments. Users consistently praise its intuitive interface, highlighting how its clean navigation makes it a breeze to use, even for team members who aren't security veterans. This ease of use is crucial in today's fast-paced IT landscape, where teams need to quickly grasp and address security concerns. The software's strength lies in its risk assessment and prioritization capabilities. It excels at pinpointing and ranking vulnerabilities, allowing organizations to efficiently allocate resources to the most critical threats. Seamless integration with other security tools further amplifies its effectiveness, streamlining workflows and improving overall security posture. However, some users find the reporting features to be a bit clunky and less intuitive than the rest of the platform. This shortcoming, while notable, doesn't overshadow the software's strengths. Cisco Vulnerability Management appears to be a robust solution for organizations heavily invested in the Cisco ecosystem, but its effectiveness in heterogeneous environments might be limited. If your organization primarily relies on Cisco solutions, this platform could be a game-changer for bolstering your security stance.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...