Fusion Connect vs Cisco CallManager

Can Fusion Connect help businesses effectively bridge the communication gap, or will it leave them feeling lost in the connection? User reviews from the past year present a mixed bag, with some praising Fusion Connect's strengths while others express significant dissatisfaction. On the positive side, customers applaud the company's expertise in cloud-based communication solutions, particularly highlighting the high-speed connectivity and cost savings offered by their SD-WAN network. Many users rave about the responsiveness and knowledge of the support and service teams, emphasizing the smooth onboarding experience and helpful guidance provided. For instance, one customer noted that Fusion Connect "got all of the phones hooked up and everything done without any interruptions," demonstrating the company's commitment to seamless implementation. However, a significant number of negative reviews, especially on the Better Business Bureau website, paint a different picture. Customers report extremely negative experiences, citing difficulties in dealing with the company and unreasonable charges. One user described Fusion Connect as "the most unpleasant and unreasonable" company they've dealt with, detailing a frustrating experience with a hidden three-year contract and exorbitant cancellation fees. This sentiment is echoed by another customer who was shocked to be slapped with a $6,000 cancellation fee, urging others to "save yourself a lot of $ and headaches" by choosing alternative solutions like Zoom phone. These contrasting experiences suggest that while Fusion Connect excels in providing robust cloud communication solutions and generally receives positive feedback for its technical aspects, there are serious concerns regarding transparency, contract terms, and customer service in specific instances. Therefore, Fusion Connect seems best suited for businesses willing to thoroughly scrutinize contractual details and prioritize the technical merits of the service, understanding that customer service experiences may vary.

Can Cisco CallManager unify your communication woes, or will it leave you *hanging* on the line? User reviews from the last year suggest Cisco CallManager, a platform for managing tasks like Unified Communications, is a reliable and secure option for organizations seeking robust communication management. Users consistently praise its comprehensive features, highlighting its ability to seamlessly integrate voice, video, and messaging services, which is essential for streamlining communication in today's hybrid work environments. They particularly appreciate its interoperability with other Cisco products, creating a unified ecosystem that enhances productivity and collaboration. However, some users find the system's complexity a double-edged sword. While its advanced features cater to diverse needs, they can be daunting for those unfamiliar with Cisco's ecosystem, requiring specialized knowledge and training for effective management. A notable strength of Cisco CallManager is its robust security features, making it a top choice for organizations with stringent security requirements, particularly those in sectors like finance and healthcare where data protection is paramount. However, the system's complexity rears its head again in managing logs and call records, a process some users find cumbersome and time-consuming. This complexity, coupled with the potential need for specialized IT expertise, makes Cisco CallManager best suited for medium to large organizations with the resources to navigate its learning curve and maximize its potential. Smaller organizations might find its feature set overwhelming and its management demanding, potentially overshadowing its benefits.