HackerEarth vs CodeSubmit

User reviews from the past year paint a largely positive picture of HackerEarth as a technical assessment tool, particularly for those seeking to unearth top-tier coding talent. Users consistently applaud the platform's expansive and challenging question library, which many find to be a step up from competitors like HackerRank. For instance, one user praised HackerEarth's "versatility of question types," highlighting the availability of coding exercises, descriptive questions, and multiple-choice questions. However, some users have raised concerns about the clarity of certain questions, especially those seemingly crafted by non-native English speakers. This lack of clarity, coupled with what some perceive as stringent time limits, can lead to frustration among candidates. Despite these drawbacks, HackerEarth's robust feature set, including remote proctoring, automatic evaluation, and plagiarism detection, makes it a compelling choice for companies invested in hosting hackathons and coding challenges. Overall, HackerEarth emerges as a powerful ally for organizations looking to streamline their technical recruitment process, particularly those seeking candidates who thrive under pressure and possess advanced coding skills.

How do you submit to the idea that CodeSubmit might be the key to unlocking your next great hire? User reviews from the last year paint a largely positive picture of CodeSubmit, particularly for its effectiveness in providing a realistic coding environment that allows candidates to flex their coding muscles through real-world tasks instead of abstract problems. For instance, one user, a CTO of a small startup, praised CodeSubmit's extensive library of frameworks and projects, highlighting how it saved him the time and effort of creating technical tests from scratch. This sentiment is echoed by other users who appreciate the platform's user-friendly interface and the ability to tailor assessments to specific job roles.However, some users point out a couple of areas where CodeSubmit could improve. A recurring concern is the lack of seamless integration with Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), which can be a bit of a headache for larger organizations. Additionally, the platform's pricing structure, while considered fair by some, has been flagged as potentially pricey for startups operating on a shoestring budget. Despite these minor drawbacks, CodeSubmit's strengths lie in its ability to facilitate a more practical and less stressful technical assessment experience, making it particularly well-suited for companies looking to evaluate candidates based on real-world skills rather than just their ability to solve theoretical problems.