Eightfold vs Oracle Talent Management

Eightfold's user reviews indicate it is a robust talent management system that provides strong features for candidate sourcing, talent analytics, and employee engagement. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and comprehensive functionality, which allows them to manage the entire talent lifecycle efficiently. Compared to similar products, Eightfold stands out for its AI-powered talent matching capabilities, which help organizations identify and hire the best candidates quickly and effectively. However, some users have reported occasional technical glitches and a need for more customization options. Eightfold's differentiating factors include its emphasis on diversity and inclusion, its ability to integrate with other HR systems, and its focus on employee experience. These factors are important because they enable organizations to build a diverse and inclusive workforce, streamline their HR processes, and create a positive work environment that attracts and retains top talent. Overall, Eightfold is most suited for large organizations with complex talent management needs that are looking for a comprehensive and AI-powered solution.

Oracle is an overall talent management solution. Performance management was one of its most popular aspects. Users liked the overall management, professional development and skill set defining features. Its employee management, onboarding and talent management worked well aiding in optimizing the workforce. Recruiting was an especially well-liked tool with its ability to check candidate status, pull transcripts and engage in talent sourcing. Last, users were happy with its reporting elements as well. As for reviewer dissatisfaction, the most disliked aspect was the price. It’s a comprehensive and expensive product. This included a lack of adequate skill-based search, poor navigation, problems that arose from internet connections, and an overall feeling of it being too complicated. Many users also experience bugs, glitches and a slow data management process. The initial learning curve was said to be steep, it was hard to navigate, and users disliked the UI and lack of expansive documentation. Overall, this is a good tool for a medium-sized or enterprise company, especially one that’s looking for help recruiting talent and engaging in professional development. Though users should leave time for adapting to its somewhat complicated functionality. For smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, this is likely not the best solution.