Top ApplicantStack Alternatives & Competitors For 2024

Is ApplicantStack the ace up your sleeve when it comes to hiring? Recent user reviews suggest that while ApplicantStack offers a solid foundation for talent management, it may not be the "holy grail" for every organization. Users praise its user-friendly interface and customizable features, particularly highlighting the ease with which they can tailor email templates and set up automated messages throughout the hiring process. However, a recurring gripe is the lack of robust reporting functionality, making it difficult to extract specific insights without manual intervention. For instance, one user expressed frustration at not being able to easily generate a report showing only actively recruiting jobs, necessitating a cumbersome manual review process. While ApplicantStack shines in its core functionality of managing applications, its limitations become apparent when compared to competitors like JobDiva, which users commend for its superior reporting capabilities. This suggests that ApplicantStack might be best suited for smaller to mid-sized companies that prioritize ease of use and customization over advanced analytics. Larger organizations with complex reporting needs might find ApplicantStack's limitations a significant drawback.

The solution has an intuitive user interface, and it’s easy for novice users to navigate the system. Users can create and manage workflows and set-up recruiting, goal-setting and performance evaluation functions. It has an excellent support team that addresses user queries within a given time frame. It has various options to regroup the candidates by categories or profiles, schedule interviews, view candidate profiles, make interview notes and much more. On the other hand, some users feel that the solution has limited reporting capabilities and it doesn’t allow scheduling interviews with multiple interviewers or a conference call. In addition, it doesn’t offer integration with the background checking system.

Oracle is an overall talent management solution. Performance management was one of its most popular aspects. Users liked the overall management, professional development and skill set defining features. Its employee management, onboarding and talent management worked well aiding in optimizing the workforce. Recruiting was an especially well-liked tool with its ability to check candidate status, pull transcripts and engage in talent sourcing. Last, users were happy with its reporting elements as well. As for reviewer dissatisfaction, the most disliked aspect was the price. It’s a comprehensive and expensive product. This included a lack of adequate skill-based search, poor navigation, problems that arose from internet connections, and an overall feeling of it being too complicated. Many users also experience bugs, glitches and a slow data management process. The initial learning curve was said to be steep, it was hard to navigate, and users disliked the UI and lack of expansive documentation. Overall, this is a good tool for a medium-sized or enterprise company, especially one that’s looking for help recruiting talent and engaging in professional development. Though users should leave time for adapting to its somewhat complicated functionality. For smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, this is likely not the best solution.

Willis Tower Watson is a finance and risk management solution. Users with positive experiences especially enjoyed the anonymous survey to give feedback to managers — they said it helped drive real change within their organizations. Others like its reporting tools and felt the functionality was easy to adopt and navigate. Retirement funds were a point of contention. Nearly every user who talked about trying to access their pension fund said it was difficult and took longer than expected, ran into issues trying to figure out how to do so or recorded other problems. These negative reviews came mainly from the site TrustRadius. Reviewers posted some comments during an apparent post-COVID backlog. However, many others came from 2019 or earlier. Users were also displeased with the customer service. They complained about a lack of updates, murky communication and misquotes. Even the positive reviews for the customer service said representatives were helpful, but clearly very overworked. Willis Tower Watson may be a good choice for small to medium businesses looking for help with finances and risk management; however, tread carefully around its retirement services.

Avature is a talent management, recruiting and HR solution. Reviewers were most pleased with the recruiting tools saying it was easy to reach out to candidates, send automated emails, analyze the candidate pool and easily access past employment. They liked the dashboard and felt the system was easy to navigate with sophisticated search functionality. Most felt the support was adequate and the customer service was responsive, leading to easy setup and implementation. Many customized it to fit their specific workflows and found it useful. Other well-reviewed features included reporting and automation. One standard warning from reviewers was that Avature is a platform with robust features. They advised potential users to understand their priorities and requirements list inside and out before adopting the platform. Otherwise, this could lead to using a platform with more features than a smaller or less complicated business might need. Reviewers reported some issues with integrations and found the resume management somewhat unwieldy. Overall, Avature is an appropriate choice for medium and large enterprise ventures with complex recruiting needs. It’s beneficial for companies who screen large talent pools and want a broader HR suite.