Our analysts compared SHL vs Criteria based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Talent Assessment Tools, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
SHL (Saville Assessment) specializes in psychometric testing and assessment solutions for companies and organizations. SHL provides a range of assessment tools and services to help companies identify and develop talent, including personality and behavioral assessments, cognitive ability tests, leadership assessments, and more.
SHL's assessments are designed to help companies make better decisions about their talent, including hiring, promoting, and developing employees. SHL assessments are backed by research and validated for accuracy and fairness, and are designed to be flexible and customizable to meet the unique needs of each organization.
Criteria is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline the talent assessment process, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to enhance their hiring practices. By offering a suite of tools that facilitate the evaluation of candidates' skills, personality, and cognitive abilities, Criteria helps businesses of all sizes make informed hiring decisions. One of the key benefits of using Criteria is its ability to significantly reduce hiring time and improve the quality of hires through data-driven insights. Among its most popular features are customizable assessments, real-time reporting, and an intuitive user interface, which collectively contribute to a more efficient and effective recruitment process. When compared to similar products in the market, users often highlight Criteria's user-friendly design and the relevance of its assessment tools as distinguishing factors. Pricing for Criteria typically varies based on the size of the organization and the specific needs, with options ranging from subscription-based models to per-assessment pricing, allowing for flexibility and scalability according to the company's requirements.
among all Talent Assessment Tools
Criteria has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 97% when considering 93 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated SHL and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Scoring Tools.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Criteria and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall Talent Assessment Tools available today and earns best-in-class honors for Assessments and Platform and Security Capabilities. Criteria stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
User reviews for SHL highlight several strengths and weaknesses. Users praise SHL for its comprehensive assessments, offering a wide range of evaluations that can be tailored to specific job roles and competencies. Objective decision-making is another key strength, as SHL's standardized assessments reduce biases and subjectivity in hiring, promoting fairness. The platform's data-driven insights and analytics are well-received, enabling organizations to make informed talent management decisions. However, there are limitations users point out. Some find the platform's complexity in customization challenging, especially when creating highly customized assessments. Integration with existing HR systems can be complex and may require additional time and resources. Data privacy and security are concerns, given the sensitive candidate and employee data handled. Additionally, the online nature of SHL may not suit areas with unreliable internet access. Cultural adaptation of assessments is necessary for global organizations. In comparison to similar products, SHL stands out for its range of assessments and data-driven insights. However, potential users should be aware of the learning curve and consider their integration and data privacy needs. Overall, it is seen as a valuable tool for talent assessment and management, particularly for organizations seeking objective and data-driven hiring practices.
User reviews of Criteria reveal its strengths and weaknesses. Users commend the platform for its comprehensive assessments and customization options, enabling tailored evaluations for various job roles. Objective decision-making is a key highlight, as the standardized assessments reduce biases and subjectivity in hiring. The platform's data-driven insights and remote proctoring capabilities are also well-received. Users value the global accessibility of Criteria's online platform, crucial in today's diverse and remote work environment. On the flip side, users report a learning curve when creating highly customized assessments, which may deter beginners. Integration challenges with existing systems and data privacy concerns are also noted, necessitating careful management. Some find the online nature of Criteria limiting in areas with unreliable internet access. Additionally, assessments may require cultural adaptation for optimal effectiveness. In comparison to similar products, Criteria stands out for its range of assessments and data-driven insights. However, potential users should be aware of the learning curve and consider their integration and data privacy needs. Overall, it is seen as a valuable tool for talent assessment and management, particularly for organizations seeking objective hiring practices.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...