Taleo vs Workable

User reviews of Taleo paint a picture of a powerful talent management suite capable of streamlining recruitment processes and improving candidate experience. However, its strengths come with some limitations, prompting users to weigh its advantages against the competition. Many users praise Taleo's ease of use and comprehensive features, citing it as a significant improvement over other platforms like Workday and Greenhouse. The automated workflows and data-driven insights are particularly lauded for saving time and providing valuable recruitment intelligence. However, some users note a steeper learning curve compared to simpler solutions like BambooHR, emphasizing the importance of adequate training and support. One user states, "Taleo has helped us reduce our time to hire by 25%. The automation features are great, and we're able to get more qualified candidates in the door." However, another user expresses a concern, stating, "The platform can be overwhelming at first, especially if you're not familiar with similar systems. Training is crucial." Another recurring theme is Taleo's mobile accessibility, which users find crucial for engaging candidates and managing the hiring process on the go. A user highlights, "The mobile app is a game-changer. I can review applications and interview candidates from anywhere, which is incredibly convenient." However, some users lament the lack of certain features available only on the desktop version, highlighting the need for further mobile development. Ultimately, user reviews reveal Taleo's strengths in streamlining recruitment, enhancing candidate experience, and providing data-driven insights. While its complexity may be a hurdle for some, its powerful features and mobile accessibility hold significant appeal for organizations looking to optimize their talent acquisition process.

Workable is a recruiting solution that provides a range of hiring tools. Users who commented on the platform said it was efficient and saved time and effort with its automated processes. Reviewers liked the UI and said it was easy to learn and adopt and had overwhelmingly positive experiences with the prompt and knowledgeable customer service. They felt the reporting worked well and delivered the necessary data to plan strategically. Above all, they were impressed with the recruiting functionality and especially liked the ATS, one-click job posting and talent acquisition and sourcing features. Hiring managers especially found it beneficial. In terms of issues and opportunities for growth, users consistently had problems attaching and grouping additional files with the candidate profile. They state it was difficult to centralize documents other than resumes such as certifications, samples, letters of recommendation and more. Some also felt that the overall customization and branding was somewhat limited. Last, workers reported difficulty getting everyone’s feed together in group settings on the platform. Workable may be a good fit for medium-sized organizations, especially those with hiring managers, who need to automate the recruiting process. Larger companies may find it too limiting. It may also be a good fit for small companies with the necessary budget; many found it quite affordable.