Our analysts compared CEIPAL ATS vs SilkRoad Recruiting based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Recruitment Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
CEIPAL ATS is a cloud-based applicant tracking system (ATS) designed to streamline the entire recruitment process for staffing agencies. It helps manage job postings, candidate applications, communications, and onboarding, all in one place.
CEIPAL ATS is ideal for recruiting agencies of all sizes, but its intuitive interface and robust features make it particularly well-suited for growing businesses and those seeking to scale their operations. Key benefits include improved candidate experience, increased recruiter productivity and reduced time-to-hire.
Popular features include AI-powered candidate matching, automated workflows and a mobile-friendly interface. User reviews consistently praise CEIPAL's ease of use, powerful search functionalities and excellent customer support. While pricing varies based on subscription level and agency size, CEIPAL ATS offers competitive pricing plans with per-user and per-month billing options.
Only available for cloud deployment, it starts at $24 per user monthly. Overall, CEIPAL ATS is a comprehensive and user-friendly ATS, helping staffing agencies of all sizes attract top talent and optimize their recruitment processes.
among all Recruitment Software
CEIPAL ATS has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 92% when considering 2590 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
SilkRoad Recruiting has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 279 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
CEIPAL ATS stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
CEIPAL ATS receives mixed reviews from users with a blend of powerful features and some notable drawbacks. Praised for its user-friendly interface, CEIPAL allows quick navigation across various work areas, making it easy for recruiters to manage tasks efficiently. The data visualization capabilities provide a comprehensive view of applicant pipelines and team performance metrics, ensuring informed decision-making.Users also appreciate the internal databases for storing and accessing candidate profiles. Compared to its competitors, users often find CEIPAL ATS more user-friendly than Greenhouse, but less customizable than Bullhorn. Users particularly appreciate the built-in AI-powered candidate matching compared to SmartRecruiters, which lacks similar features.However, there are some areas where CEIPAL could improve. Users universally express frustration with frequent automatic logouts, which disrupt workflow and decrease productivity. Speed issues are another concern, with reports of the system lagging or slowing down when processing large data sets or when many users are active simultaneously.If you’re considering CEIPAL ATS, it’s essential to weigh these pros and cons carefully. Its strengths in user experience, AI-powered matching, and time-saving automation make it a compelling choice for agencies prioritizing ease of use and efficient workflows.If your business requires high data processing, consider how the system's speed and occasional bugs might impact overall productivity. Overall, CEIPAL ATS seems best suited for staffing agencies seeking a user-friendly and mobile-accessible ATS with strong candidate management features.
Although the solution addresses the basic needs for recruitment, some users complain it focuses more on the performance management and onboarding processes than the recruiting process. It has limited reporting and search capabilities compared to the other solutions in the market. Most users believe UI and UX should be more intuitive to facilitate ease of use.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...