Our analysts compared Paymo vs LiquidPlanner based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Project Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Project Management Software
Paymo has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 93% when considering 1093 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
LiquidPlanner has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 1654 user reviews from 6 recognized software review sites.
Paymo stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Paymo is a project management software that helps teams stay organized and on track. It offers a variety of features, including task management, project planning, resource management, and collaboration tools. Paymo has been praised by users for its ease of use, flexibility, and affordability. It is also highly customizable, so teams can tailor it to their specific needs. Paymo's time tracking feature is particularly well-regarded, as it allows users to easily track the time they spend on different tasks and projects. This information can then be used to generate invoices, track productivity, and make better decisions about how to allocate resources. However, some users have complained that Paymo can be difficult to learn, and that it lacks some of the features offered by more expensive project management software, such as advanced reporting and analytics. Additionally, some users have reported experiencing glitches with the sign-up process. Overall, Paymo is a solid choice for small and medium-sized businesses that are looking for a project management software that is easy to use and affordable. It is particularly well-suited for businesses that need to track time and expenses, as well as those that need to collaborate on projects with team members. However, businesses that need more advanced features may want to consider other options.
LiquidPlanner provides robust functionality to plan and execute work. It offers unique predictive resource-based scheduling that organizes based on priority. It makes tracking multiple, large, complex projects possible and easy. Users can comment and attach files to each task to simplify communication and collaboration. Reviewers complained that its outdated user interface has made navigation difficult and confusing at times. It also involves a steep learning curve that requires time and training to get used to it. Its high price tag compared to other solutions was also mentioned.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...