Our analysts compared 5pm vs LiquidPlanner based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Project Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Project Management Software
5pm has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 198 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
LiquidPlanner has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 1654 user reviews from 6 recognized software review sites.
5pm's user reviews have been consistently positive over the past year, with users praising its intuitive interface, powerful features, and excellent customer support. Many users believe that 5pm compares favorably to similar products like Asana and Trello, citing its strengths in project planning, task management, and collaboration. One of 5pm's key strengths is its visual project planning capabilities. Users appreciate the ability to create Gantt charts, timelines, and Kanban boards, which provide a clear and comprehensive overview of project progress. Additionally, 5pm's task management features are robust and flexible, allowing users to assign tasks, set deadlines, and track progress. The collaboration tools are also well-received, with users highlighting the ability to share files, comment on tasks, and receive real-time updates. However, some users have noted that 5pm's reporting capabilities could be improved. While the software provides basic reporting functionality, some users have expressed a desire for more advanced reporting options. Additionally, a few users have reported occasional performance issues, particularly when working with large projects or complex tasks. Overall, 5pm is a highly-rated project management software that is well-suited for teams of all sizes. Its intuitive interface, powerful features, and excellent customer support make it a great choice for businesses looking to improve their project management processes.
LiquidPlanner provides robust functionality to plan and execute work. It offers unique predictive resource-based scheduling that organizes based on priority. It makes tracking multiple, large, complex projects possible and easy. Users can comment and attach files to each task to simplify communication and collaboration. Reviewers complained that its outdated user interface has made navigation difficult and confusing at times. It also involves a steep learning curve that requires time and training to get used to it. Its high price tag compared to other solutions was also mentioned.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...