Looking for alternatives to OpenBOM? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Project Management, Document Management, and Change Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real PLM Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of OpenBOM to leading industry alternatives like SAP PLM, Teamcenter, Aras, and Selerant Devex.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all PLM Software
OpenBOM has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 40 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
SAP PLM has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 77% when considering 81 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Teamcenter has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 83% when considering 155 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Aras has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 74% when considering 29 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Selerant Devex has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 70% when considering 2 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Over the past year, OpenBOM has carved out a niche for itself in the PLM software market, distinguishing itself through its user-friendly interface and robust feature set. Users have lauded its real-time collaboration tools, which streamline the product development process by allowing team members to work simultaneously on projects, reducing the time to market. This feature, in particular, has been highlighted as a game-changer, setting OpenBOM apart from competitors like Autodesk Fusion Lifecycle and Arena PLM, which, while powerful, can sometimes lag in real-time data synchronization. However, some users have pointed out weaknesses, such as the initial learning curve and occasional glitches in the system, which can disrupt workflow. Despite these hiccups, the consensus is that OpenBOM offers comprehensive integration capabilities, particularly with CAD software, which enhances its utility for engineering teams. This seamless integration facilitates a smoother transition from design to manufacturing, a critical factor in product lifecycle management that some users felt was less efficiently handled by alternatives like PTC Windchill. What makes OpenBOM stand out is its scalability and affordability, making it an attractive option for small to medium-sized businesses. The platform's ability to adapt to various business sizes without significant performance degradation is a testament to its robust architecture. This scalability, coupled with a transparent pricing model, underscores its appeal to startups and growing companies that require a flexible, cost-effective PLM solution. In conclusion, OpenBOM is most suited for small to medium-sized enterprises seeking a user-friendly, scalable PLM solution that excels in real-time collaboration and CAD integration. Its unique blend of features, affordability, and performance makes it a compelling choice for businesses aiming to streamline their product development processes without breaking the bank.
SAP PLM is a popular PLM software that has received mixed reviews from users in the last year. Many users praise its powerful features and integration with other SAP products, but some find it complex and expensive. One of the main strengths of SAP PLM is its ability to manage complex product lifecycles, including engineering, manufacturing, and service. It also offers a wide range of features for managing product data, such as CAD integration, bill of materials management, and change management. SAP PLM is well-integrated with other SAP products, such as SAP ERP and SAP CRM, which can provide users with a single view of their product data across the entire enterprise. However, SAP PLM can be complex and expensive to implement, and some users find it difficult to use. It is important to note that SAP PLM is best suited for large enterprises with complex product lifecycles. Smaller businesses may find it too expensive and complex for their needs. In comparison to similar products, SAP PLM is a more comprehensive and feature-rich solution. However, it is also more expensive and complex than some of its competitors. One of the key differentiating factors of SAP PLM is its ability to manage complex product lifecycles. It also offers a wide range of features for managing product data, such as CAD integration, bill of materials management, and change management. SAP PLM is well-integrated with other SAP products, such as SAP ERP and SAP CRM, which can provide users with a single view of their product data across the entire enterprise. Overall, SAP PLM is a powerful and comprehensive PLM software that is best suited for large enterprises with complex product lifecycles. However, it is important to note that SAP PLM can be complex and expensive to implement, and some users find it difficult to use. Smaller businesses may find it too expensive and complex for their needs.
Teamcenter is a PLM software that helps users maintain all aspects of their product lifecycles. Users rave about its performability because it streamlines jobs, links large assemblies and is easy to leverage. Compliance and sustainability, change management, document management and product cost management are just some of the features that users find useful in managing workflows. This program also executes 3D simulations, data studies and relaying information to other worksites. Although some users have experienced system freezes and bugs, most find this solution the perfect fit for their business.
Aras is a cloud-based PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) software solution that is trusted by users for its ability to connect people, processes, and data across the entire product lifecycle. Users rave about its strengths, such as its adaptability, ease of use, and robust capabilities. Aras outshines similar products with its ability to be customized to fit specific business needs, making it an ideal choice for companies looking for a tailored solution. It also offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies adoption and training, reducing the time and effort required for implementation. Additionally, Aras's comprehensive capabilities cover the entire product lifecycle, from design and engineering to manufacturing and service, providing a single source of truth for all product-related information. These strengths make Aras a valuable asset for businesses looking to improve collaboration, streamline processes, and drive innovation. However, some users have expressed concerns about the complexity of the software, particularly for users with limited technical expertise. Additionally, the cost of implementation and maintenance can be a barrier for some businesses. Despite these drawbacks, Aras remains a top choice for companies seeking a powerful and flexible PLM solution. Its ability to connect people, processes, and data, combined with its adaptability and robust capabilities, make it an ideal choice for businesses looking to optimize their product lifecycle management. Overall, Aras is best suited for medium to large-sized businesses with complex product lifecycles and a need for a customizable and comprehensive PLM solution. Its ability to connect people, processes, and data, combined with its adaptability and robust capabilities, make it an ideal choice for businesses looking to improve collaboration, streamline processes, and drive innovation.
User reviews from the past year suggest a mixed bag. While many appreciate its single view of product data, enabling streamlined collaboration and faster time-to-market, some find its user interface less intuitive than competitors like Oracle PLM. This difficulty in navigation can lead to frustration and decreased efficiency, especially for new users. A key differentiator is Selerant Devex's focus on formula-based product development, making it ideal for industries like food & beverage and cosmetics. This specialization is evident in its robust features for managing complex formulations and regulatory compliance, aspects not as deeply explored by more generalist PLM platforms. Selerant Devex is best suited for companies, particularly those of all sizes, in sectors heavily reliant on formula-based product development. Its strength lies in providing a centralized platform for managing intricate formulations, ensuring regulatory compliance, and facilitating seamless collaboration amongst teams. However, businesses prioritizing user-friendliness and a more intuitive interface might find other PLM solutions more appealing.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...