Our analysts compared Centric PLM vs Epicor PLM based on data from our 400+ point analysis of PLM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Centric PLM is a software solution designed to streamline the entire product lifecycle, from ideation and design to sourcing, production, and launch. It caters particularly to companies in fast-moving consumer goods industries like fashion, apparel, and homeware.
Centric PLM offers several key benefits. It centralizes product data, eliminating the need to search through scattered spreadsheets and emails. This fosters improved collaboration among internal teams and external partners.
The software boasts features like mobile applications for on-the-go access, visual collaboration tools, and integrations with 3D design software. These features can help companies reduce time to market, improve product quality, and gain a competitive edge.
While user experiences can vary, Centric PLM is generally praised for its scalability and modularity. Companies can choose the specific functionalities they need, making it suitable for businesses of various sizes. Pricing is typically based on a subscription model with tiers offering different features and user capacities.
This translates into several benefits, including improved collaboration between engineering, design, and manufacturing teams. Streamlined change control processes help ensure everyone is working on the latest version of a product. Additionally, Epicor PLM integrates seamlessly with Epicor ERP (formerly Kinetic), creating a unified system for product development and enterprise resource planning.
When compared to similar PLM products, user experience highlights of Epicor PLM include its ease of use and intuitive interface. Furthermore, its tight integration with Epicor ERP is a major advantage for manufacturers who already use that system.
Pricing for Epicor PLM is typically based on a per-user, per-year subscription model, with costs varying depending on the specific features and functionality required.
among all PLM Software
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Centric PLM and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Packaging and Label Management.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Epicor PLM and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Deployment Options.
Recent user reviews of Centric PLM highlight its ability to centralize product data and streamline workflows, leading to faster time-to-market. One reviewer, a product manager at a fashion company, praised Centric PLM for eliminating scattered information across emails and spreadsheets, which previously caused delays in communication and product development. This centralized approach is particularly beneficial in fast-paced industries like fashion, where trends can change quickly and getting products to market swiftly is crucial. However, reviewers also noted challenges associated with Centric PLM's complexity. Some users reported a steep learning curve, mentioning it takes time for new users to become comfortable with the software's extensive features. This can be a hurdle for companies with limited training resources. Additionally, extensive customization can be difficult, which may not be ideal for businesses needing a highly tailored PLM solution. For instance, a small business with unique design processes might find Centric PLM's customization capabilities too cumbersome compared to more user-friendly options. Overall, Centric PLM seems well-suited for medium to large companies in industries like fashion, consumer goods, and homeware that value a centralized data repository, streamlined communication, and the ability to handle complex workflows. However, the steep learning curve and potentially high costs mean smaller businesses or those with unique process needs may want to explore alternative PLM solutions offering greater ease of use or more straightforward customization options.
Recent reviews of Epicor PLM highlight its strengths in centralizing product data and streamlining workflows, especially for users in complex manufacturing environments. One key advantage is its ability to manage revisions and modifications effectively, preventing costly errors caused by outdated information. This is particularly valuable in industries like aerospace, where even minor design tweaks can have significant consequences. However, some users with very large or intricate product lines mention concerns about scalability, suggesting Epicor PLM might be a better fit for mid-sized manufacturers. Another common theme in reviews is the ease of collaboration fostered by Epicor PLM. By providing a central platform for engineers, designers, and manufacturing personnel, it breaks down departmental silos and improves communication. This can significantly reduce rework caused by miscommunication or conflicting information. However, some users found the initial setup and learning curve steeper compared to simpler PLM solutions. This highlights the importance of considering the technical expertise of your team when choosing a PLM system. Overall, Epicor PLM appears to be a well-regarded solution for mid-sized manufacturers seeking to improve collaboration, manage complex product data, and streamline product development processes. However, its cost of customization and potential scalability limitations for very large enterprises are important factors to consider before implementation.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...