Our analysts compared Luma Health vs Tebra Engage based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Patient Scheduling Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Patient Scheduling Software
Luma Health has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 102 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Tebra Engage has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 80% when considering 636 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Luma Health stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Tebra Engage and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall Patient Scheduling Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Dashboard and Reporting, Patient Engagement and Telehealth.
Luma Health paints a mixed picture in user reviews. Praised for its streamlined communication, empowered patients, and workflow efficiency, it faces criticism for limited customization, occasional glitches, and higher price tags. "Luma transformed our patient engagement," one user raves. "Appointment reminders cut no-shows in half, and patients love the secure messaging and online bill pay." Others echo this sentiment, highlighting Luma's "intuitive interface" and "patient-centric approach" compared to "clunky alternatives." However, some users find Luma less flexible. "Customization options are limited," one reviewer complains. "I wish I could personalize certain features to better fit our practice's workflow." Others mention occasional technical hiccups, calling them "frustrating workflow disruptions." Cost also emerges as a concern. "Compared to other patient engagement platforms, Luma can be expensive, especially for smaller practices," one user notes. This price point, coupled with the onboarding effort required to get patients actively using the platform, can be a hurdle for some. Overall, Luma Health shines in its ease of use and patient-centric features, but its customization limitations, technical glitches, and higher price tag might deter some users. Ultimately, the decision seems to hinge on individual practice needs and budget constraints. As one user aptly summarizes, "Luma is a powerful tool, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution."
Tebra Engage cuts through the clutter of Patient Engagement platforms with its laser focus on streamlining communication and boosting patient satisfaction. Users rave about its intuitive interface, praising its "drag-and-drop ease" and "learning curve that practically doesn't exist." This simplicity shines when contrasted with "clunky competitors" and "overly complex interfaces" mentioned in several reviews. But Tebra Engage isn't just about ease of use. Its powerful automation features are a game-changer, with one user calling it a "lifesaver for appointment reminders and medication adherence tracking." This frees up staff time for more personalized interactions, a stark contrast to the "robotic, impersonal feel" of other platforms. However, some reviewers mentioned limited reporting capabilities compared to "feature-rich behemoths" in the space. But for many, Tebra Engage's strengths outweigh this. As one user put it, "I'd rather have a platform that's actually used by patients than one with every bell and whistle gathering dust." Ultimately, Tebra Engage stands out for its user-centric approach, prioritizing clear communication and engagement over bells and whistles. In a world of complex healthcare software, its simplicity and focus on patient interaction make it a breath of fresh air, leaving users feeling "empowered" and "truly connected" to their patients.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...