Our analysts compared JobBOSS² vs QAD ERP based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Manufacturing Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Manufacturing Software
QAD ERP has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 74% when considering 54 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Is JobBOSS² the boss of manufacturing software? User reviews from the past year suggest a mixed bag. While JobBOSS² boasts a robust suite of features designed to streamline manufacturing operations, some users have voiced concerns. A standout strength is its comprehensive inventory tracking, allowing businesses to monitor raw materials, works in progress, and finished goods. This granular visibility empowers better production planning and scheduling decisions. Users also appreciate the order management capabilities, enabling efficient tracking, quote generation, and invoicing, ultimately enhancing customer service and potentially boosting sales. However, some users have reported a steep learning curve, finding the software's interface less intuitive than desired. Additionally, occasional glitches and slowdowns have been cited as drawbacks, impacting productivity and user satisfaction. Despite these challenges, JobBOSS² differentiates itself through its industry-specific focus, catering specifically to the nuances of manufacturing. This targeted approach is particularly valuable for businesses seeking a solution tailored to their unique needs. Overall, JobBOSS² appears best suited for established manufacturing companies with dedicated IT resources to navigate the software's complexities and address occasional technical hiccups. Smaller businesses or those lacking technical expertise might find alternative solutions more user-friendly and manageable.
User reviews of QAD ERP reveal a love-hate relationship. Fans tout its industry-specific muscle and enhanced control, with one user gushing, "It's like SAP on steroids for automakers; we finally have real-time visibility into production flows." However, its complexity can be daunting. "Compared to Acumatica," admits another, "QAD has a steeper learning curve, but its customization blows it out of the water, especially for our intricate assembly lines." The customization aspect is a double-edged sword. "Implementing QAD was an Everest-sized task," laments one reviewer, "and ongoing tweaks can be pricey compared to something like NetSuite." In the end, user experiences suggest QAD shines for manufacturers craving a highly configurable and industry-specific platform, but be prepared to invest sweat and tears (and dollars) in implementation and training.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...