IQS vs Made2Manage

IQS received generally positive feedback from users in the past year. Users found its interface intuitive and easy to navigate, making it simple to learn and use. They also appreciated the software's flexibility, which allowed them to customize it to fit their specific needs. Some users noted that IQS could be slow at times, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Others mentioned that the reporting features could be more robust. What sets IQS apart is its comprehensive quality management capabilities. It covers everything from document control and training management to non-conformance tracking and corrective action. This makes it a one-stop shop for all things quality-related, which can be a major advantage for businesses looking to streamline their operations. The software's focus on compliance is another key differentiator. IQS helps businesses meet the requirements of various industry standards, such as ISO 9001 and FDA 21 CFR Part 11. This can save businesses time and money by avoiding costly compliance issues. IQS is best suited for small to mid-sized manufacturing businesses that need a comprehensive and user-friendly quality management system. Its flexibility and compliance focus make it a valuable tool for businesses in a variety of industries, including automotive, aerospace, medical device, and food and beverage. However, businesses with large amounts of data or complex reporting needs may want to consider other options.

Is Made2Manage truly made to manage, or are its users left feeling mismanaged? User reviews from the past year suggest a mixed bag. While Made2Manage is praised for its robust functionality and industry-specific capabilities, particularly for small to mid-sized manufacturers, it grapples with some common criticisms. Users applaud its comprehensive features encompassing production planning, inventory management, and shop floor control, effectively integrating various manufacturing processes into a single system. However, a recurring gripe is its steep learning curve, often likened to scaling a steep manufacturing learning curve, and an outdated user interface, which some users feel detracts from its overall efficiency. Furthermore, users have reported sluggish system performance and less-than-satisfactory customer support experiences. Made2Manage's customization options, while available, are reportedly complex and demand significant time and technical expertise, potentially posing a hurdle for businesses lacking dedicated IT resources. Despite these drawbacks, its strength lies in its comprehensive functionality tailored specifically for the manufacturing industry, a critical factor for businesses seeking to streamline complex manufacturing processes. In conclusion, Made2Manage proves most suitable for small to mid-sized manufacturing businesses seeking an all-encompassing ERP solution and are prepared to invest in training and support to maximize its potential. However, businesses prioritizing a user-friendly interface, responsive customer support, and seamless implementation may find exploring alternative solutions more beneficial.