Our analysts compared ECP vs ALIS based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Long Term Care Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Long Term Care Software
ECP has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 95% when considering 36 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
ALIS has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 95% when considering 83 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
ECP stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
ALIS stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
ECP is a web-based solution that streamlines day-today-tasks of caregivers. Most users felt that the system offers all the tools and features they require to run their practices smoothly. In addition, the app is easy to use and users found it straightforward to navigate through the different services and options. Users have also pointed out that it offers remote connectivity which has helped them to provide their services while not present at the office. However, some users felt that the care plans option was not satisfactory as the learning curve was steep. Also, the system froze in the event of an internet outage that caused the users downtime.
Is ALIS the real Mc Coy for long-term care? Recent user reviews suggest that ALIS is a strong contender in the long-term care software market, particularly for its ease of use and robust reporting capabilities. Users praise its intuitive interface, which even those with limited computer experience find easy to navigate. The software's reporting functions are also highly regarded, allowing users to quickly and efficiently extract specific information without needing to manually comb through individual records. One user even shared an anecdote about a time when room numbers in the system suddenly became incorrect. They contacted support and the issue was resolved by the afternoon, highlighting the responsiveness and efficiency of the ALIS support team. However, ALIS is not without its drawbacks. Some users have pointed out that certain features seem better suited for other healthcare settings and not specifically tailored for assisted living. Terminology within the software has also been a point of contention, with some users finding it confusing or not aligned with industry-standard definitions. While ALIS boasts a comprehensive suite of features, its care plan functionality has been criticized for being overly time-consuming. Despite these criticisms, the overall sentiment towards ALIS is positive, with users emphasizing its user-friendliness and powerful reporting tools as major advantages. ALIS appears to be best suited for organizations that prioritize ease of use and need to generate detailed reports quickly. Its intuitive design makes it accessible to staff members with varying levels of technical expertise, while its robust reporting capabilities streamline administrative tasks and provide valuable insights into resident care. However, organizations with very specific terminology requirements or those seeking a highly streamlined care planning process might find ALIS less ideal.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...