Lansweeper vs ManageEngine AssetExplorer

Is Lansweeper the new sweeper in town for IT asset management, or does it need to clean up its act? User reviews from the past year paint a generally positive picture of Lansweeper, highlighting its strengths in device discovery, asset detailing, and affordability. Users particularly appreciate its ease of deployment and use, especially for software audits and report generation. For instance, one user mentioned Lansweeper's ability to track CPU, memory, and network usage on workstations at intervals, allowing them to assess user experience and validate claims about resource consumption. This granular monitoring capability was noted as a valuable feature not commonly found in other tools. However, some criticisms do surface. The reporting engine, while powerful, is considered complex and may require SQL knowledge for customization. Concerns about data sovereignty are also raised with the cloud instance, despite its superior data analysis capabilities. A few users also point out that the user interface could benefit from improvements for enhanced usability. One user specifically mentioned that while Lansweeper is simple to set up and use, its deployment tools are weak, with limited installer logic and no access to WMI for creating conditions. This suggests that while the core functionality is strong, certain aspects could be refined for a smoother user experience. Overall, Lansweeper emerges as a robust and cost-effective IT asset management solution best suited for organizations of all sizes seeking comprehensive device visibility and control. Its strengths lie in its ease of use, detailed asset information, and powerful scanning capabilities, making it particularly valuable for tasks like software audits and compliance reporting. However, organizations requiring advanced reporting customization or those with strict data sovereignty requirements might need to consider these factors.

Can ManageEngine AssetExplorer help users unearth the full potential of their IT assets? User reviews from the last year suggest a mixed bag. While AssetExplorer is generally praised for its comprehensive features, user-friendly interface, and robust reporting, some drawbacks have been reported. Users particularly appreciate the remote control feature, which enables efficient remote support and sets it apart from competitors. One user raved about the detailed overview of login history, hardware changes, and software installations, calling it "a unique tool, very different from its competitors." However, some users have reported occasional bugs in reporting, particularly within the purchase order module. The network scanning feature has also been criticized for being overly comprehensive, leading to information overload. Some users have expressed frustration with difficulties in record merging and internal issue reporting. One user, while praising the software's asset categorization, auto-detection, and license management capabilities, admitted that it "needs lots of customization in the beginning." Despite these drawbacks, ManageEngine AssetExplorer remains a powerful ITAM solution suitable for organizations of various sizes, especially those looking for an easy-to-use platform with strong remote control capabilities. However, potential users should be aware of the reported limitations in reporting, network scanning, and record management.