Our analysts compared Idaptive vs AWS IAM based on data from our 400+ point analysis of IAM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
AWS IAM (Identity and Access Management) is a sophisticated tool designed to manage user identities and control access to AWS resources. It allows administrators to create and manage AWS users and groups, and to use permissions to allow and deny their access to AWS resources. This service is particularly well-suited for enterprises and organizations in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where stringent access control and security are paramount.
One of the standout benefits of AWS IAM is its fine-grained access control, which enables detailed permissions management. Users can leverage features like multi-factor authentication (MFA), role-based access control (RBAC), and policy-based management to enhance security. Additionally, AWS IAM integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, providing a unified security framework.
Compared to similar products, AWS IAM is often praised for its scalability and robust security features. Pricing details are typically based on the number of users and the complexity of the access policies, and it is advisable to contact SelectHub for a tailored pricing quote.
among all IAM Software
Idaptive has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 180 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
How "Idaptive" is CyberArk's solution for identity access management, but is it adaptable enough to earn positive user reviews? CyberArk Idaptive users praise the software for its robust security features, which leverage big data and machine learning to protect against unauthorized access. For example, one user specifically lauded Idaptive's ability to provide top-notch security for both regular users and accounts with elevated privileges, effectively guarding against malware and unauthorized access attempts. Users also appreciate the software's single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, which streamline access to multiple applications with a single set of credentials. This feature is particularly valuable for businesses with a large number of applications, as it simplifies the user experience and reduces the risk of password fatigue. However, the software's user interface has been criticized as being less intuitive than those offered by competitors like Okta and Microsoft Azure Active Directory. Some users have also reported that the pricing structure for Idaptive can be difficult to understand, especially when adding additional features or users. While these drawbacks are notable, they do not overshadow the software's strengths in security and SSO. Overall, CyberArk Idaptive is a good choice for enterprises that prioritize security and need a scalable IAM solution that can handle both cloud and on-premises applications. Its robust security features and SSO capabilities make it a valuable tool for businesses looking to protect sensitive data and streamline user access. However, organizations that place a high value on user experience and transparent pricing may want to consider alternative solutions.
Is AWS IAM all it's cracked up to be? User reviews from the past year paint a picture of a service that, while powerful, has its share of quirks. Users consistently highlight the robust control AWS IAM gives them over their AWS resources. It's like having a highly customizable security guard at the door of your cloud, allowing you to decide who gets in, what they can access, and when. Need to grant a developer access to specific files in your S3 bucket while restricting access to others? AWS IAM can handle that. This granular control is a major selling point for many users. However, the learning curve associated with AWS IAM is a recurring gripe. Users often find the interface complex and difficult to navigate, especially those new to the platform. Imagine trying to assemble a complex piece of furniture with a poorly written instruction manual - that's the kind of frustration some users experience. While AWS IAM excels at managing access within the AWS ecosystem, it notably lacks support for resources outside of it. This limitation is a dealbreaker for some, forcing them to seek third-party solutions for comprehensive access management. Overall, AWS IAM is most suitable for businesses heavily invested in the AWS ecosystem, particularly those prioritizing granular control over their cloud resources. However, its complexity and limitations regarding external resources might give some users pause.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...