NEOGOV vs Shareworks

Recent user reviews from the past year suggest that while not flawless, NEOGOV generally hits the mark. Customers rave about its user-friendly interface, making complex HR tasks like onboarding and performance management a breeze. One user, a Human Resources Assistant Director with over two years of experience using the software, praised NEOGOV for its intuitive design, stating that it streamlined their HR processes and eliminated the need for multiple platforms. This ease of use is a key differentiator for NEOGOV, as many competing products are often bogged down by clunky interfaces and convoluted workflows. However, some users have voiced concerns about NEOGOV's customer support, citing inconsistent experiences and occasional delays in response times. Additionally, a few users have reported the need to find workarounds within the payroll module to ensure accurate information, which can be a pain point for organizations that rely on seamless payroll processing. Despite these hiccups, NEOGOV's strengths in user experience, comprehensive features, and focus on the public sector make it a solid choice for government HR departments looking to streamline their operations and improve efficiency. Think of it like this: NEOGOV is like a well-organized filing cabinet that makes finding the right document a breeze, but occasionally, you might need to call a helpful colleague to locate a misplaced file. Overall, NEOGOV is best suited for government agencies and public sector organizations seeking a user-friendly and feature-rich HR solution tailored to their specific needs, particularly those who prioritize ease of use and streamlined workflows over lightning-fast customer support.

Is Shareworks really share-worthy, or does it need a performance review? User reviews from the past year present a mixed bag when it comes to Shareworks. Some users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and robust reporting capabilities, highlighting how it simplifies complex equity plans and provides a clear audit trail. For example, one user praised the software's ability to model different forecasting scenarios, which helped them make informed decisions about their equity compensation. However, other users have voiced concerns about the platform's customer support and occasional technical glitches. One user specifically mentioned experiencing difficulties integrating Shareworks with their existing HRIS system, leading to delays and frustration. This disparity in experiences suggests that Shareworks's suitability hinges on specific needs and expectations. Shareworks seems to be a good fit for publicly traded companies or large private companies with sophisticated equity compensation plans, especially those already familiar with Morgan Stanley's suite of financial services. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive features, detailed reporting, and integration with other Morgan Stanley products. However, smaller businesses or those with simpler equity structures might find the platform's complexity and cost outweigh its benefits. Ultimately, deciding whether Shareworks truly "works" for your organization requires careful consideration of your specific requirements and a thorough assessment of its capabilities against your needs.