NEOGOV vs Cezanne HR

Recent user reviews from the past year suggest that while not flawless, NEOGOV generally hits the mark. Customers rave about its user-friendly interface, making complex HR tasks like onboarding and performance management a breeze. One user, a Human Resources Assistant Director with over two years of experience using the software, praised NEOGOV for its intuitive design, stating that it streamlined their HR processes and eliminated the need for multiple platforms. This ease of use is a key differentiator for NEOGOV, as many competing products are often bogged down by clunky interfaces and convoluted workflows. However, some users have voiced concerns about NEOGOV's customer support, citing inconsistent experiences and occasional delays in response times. Additionally, a few users have reported the need to find workarounds within the payroll module to ensure accurate information, which can be a pain point for organizations that rely on seamless payroll processing. Despite these hiccups, NEOGOV's strengths in user experience, comprehensive features, and focus on the public sector make it a solid choice for government HR departments looking to streamline their operations and improve efficiency. Think of it like this: NEOGOV is like a well-organized filing cabinet that makes finding the right document a breeze, but occasionally, you might need to call a helpful colleague to locate a misplaced file. Overall, NEOGOV is best suited for government agencies and public sector organizations seeking a user-friendly and feature-rich HR solution tailored to their specific needs, particularly those who prioritize ease of use and streamlined workflows over lightning-fast customer support.

Cezanne HR provides robust functionality to meet HR and company’s needs. It offers a single package with comprehensive tools such as people, time, absence, performance management and more. Notification and alert capabilities help everyone keep up with key email and system inboxes activities. Some users have said that the server can respond slowly where the site just hangs and confuses whether or not the entry has been submitted. It’s robust options and features can take time learning and utilizing the system to its full capabilities. However, the training and support portal available has eased the learning curve. Reviewers mentioned that the customer support team is helpful, responsive, knowledgeable and took time to check if an issue has been resolved before closing a ticket.