EPAY HCM vs Cezanne HR

Is EPAY HCM the ticket to streamlined human capital management? User reviews from the past year present a somewhat mixed bag. While EPAY HCM is generally lauded for its user-friendly interface, robust time and labor management capabilities, and stellar customer service, some users have voiced concerns about occasional performance hiccups, such as sluggishness and system glitches. A standout feature of EPAY HCM is its intuitive design, which makes it a breeze for employees to clock in and out, track their hours, and access their pay stubs. The system's prowess in handling intricate labor environments and ensuring compliance is particularly noteworthy, with features like biometric time clocks and mobile time tracking receiving high praise. Users also rave about the platform's responsive and helpful customer support, which provides peace of mind in case of any issues. However, the elephant in the room is the mixed feedback regarding the software's overall reliability and effectiveness. While many users have had positive experiences, some describe their encounters as "disastrous," citing concerns about system stability and functionality. This disparity in experiences suggests that EPAY HCM might not be a one-size-fits-all solution and may require careful consideration based on specific business needs. In conclusion, EPAY HCM appears to be a good fit for medium to large-sized businesses, particularly those with hourly workforces, that prioritize user-friendliness, robust time and attendance management, and excellent customer support. However, businesses with zero tolerance for occasional system glitches or those seeking seamless integration with a wide range of third-party applications might want to explore alternative options.

Cezanne HR provides robust functionality to meet HR and company’s needs. It offers a single package with comprehensive tools such as people, time, absence, performance management and more. Notification and alert capabilities help everyone keep up with key email and system inboxes activities. Some users have said that the server can respond slowly where the site just hangs and confuses whether or not the entry has been submitted. It’s robust options and features can take time learning and utilizing the system to its full capabilities. However, the training and support portal available has eased the learning curve. Reviewers mentioned that the customer support team is helpful, responsive, knowledgeable and took time to check if an issue has been resolved before closing a ticket.