Our analysts compared Empeon vs Built for Teams based on data from our 400+ point analysis of HR Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Empeon offers a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline HR management tasks, making it particularly well-suited for mid-sized to large organizations seeking efficiency and accuracy in their HR processes. The platform excels in automating payroll, benefits administration, time tracking, and compliance management, providing a seamless experience for HR professionals. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and robust reporting capabilities, which facilitate data-driven decision-making.
One of the standout benefits of Empeon is its ability to integrate with existing systems, reducing the need for manual data entry and minimizing errors. Popular features include customizable workflows, employee self-service portals, and advanced analytics, all of which contribute to a more organized and productive HR department. Compared to similar products, Empeon is often praised for its user-friendly design and reliable customer support.
Pricing for Empeon typically falls within a mid-range bracket, with costs varying based on the number of users and specific modules required. Payment is usually structured on a monthly or annual subscription basis, offering flexibility to accommodate different budgetary needs.
among all HR Management Software
Empeon has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 92% when considering 7 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1222 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Empeon stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Built for Teams stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Empeon has garnered largely favorable feedback from users over the past year, particularly for its user-friendly design, powerful reporting tools, and responsive customer support. Users have expressed that the platform's intuitive nature simplifies complex HR and payroll processes, making it easier to manage employee data, track time and attendance, and generate comprehensive reports. A notable strength is Empeon's capacity for customization, allowing businesses to tailor the software to their specific needs, such as configuring unique pay rules or setting up automated workflows for tasks like onboarding new hires. However, some users have reported occasional hiccups with system updates and a steeper learning curve for new users, which could pose initial challenges for those unfamiliar with similar platforms. Empeon seems particularly well-suited for healthcare organizations, as evidenced by its specialized features for this industry, such as managing complex pay calculations and ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations.
Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...