Our analysts compared Ellucian vs Built for Teams based on data from our 400+ point analysis of HR Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all HR Management Software
Ellucian has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 74% when considering 393 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1222 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Ellucian is an elearning tool that specializes in higher education. Reviewers were pleased with the range of features, simple setup and functioning integrations. They especially like the customer service, which many described as helpful and timely. One of the most significant issues found across negative reviews was with the outdated code and the user interface. Users reported that the interface was hard to learn, challenging to navigate, ugly, obsolete and frustrating. Last, users weren’t pleased with the price, feeling that it cost too much given the scope of the system. Ellucian looks like a good choice for medium-sized high education institutions. Be sure to demo extensively and establish requirements before purchasing.
Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...