Our analysts compared Built for Teams vs WebHR based on data from our 400+ point analysis of HR Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all HR Management Software
Built for Teams has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1222 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
WebHR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 1108 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.
WebHR is a payroll and HR services software. Overall, users were happy with its features and functionality and felt happy with the service. They said it was easy to learn and adapt to the workplace, though the design was dated at times. Its payroll, time and attendance, HR management and recruiting tools were especially well-reviewed. Some smaller businesses used it in lieu of hiring an outside service to manage their business. Users had issues with the integrations, in particular, finding it difficult to integrate with other programs. They also ran into issues with its mobile functionality, which they said had a less intuitive design. Occasionally, they also found bugs. Overall, it’s appropriate for businesses that want to outsource their HR services or make use of extra tools to evaluate, compensate and pay their employees.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...