Built for Teams vs Infor HCM

Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.

Infor HCM provides a comprehensive bundle of capabilities including talent management, HR service delivery and global HR, with the option to add other modules such as workforce management and HCM analytics as needed. Frequent lags do occur, however, leading to downtime and lower productivity. It also presents a steep learning curve and lacks some basic HR features, which is something to consider before making a choice. That said, it promotes employee engagement and offers an intuitive experience, with extensive accessibility and critical HR tools.