Our analysts compared BambooHR vs Built for Teams based on data from our 400+ point analysis of HR Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all HR Management Software
BambooHR has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 4948 user reviews from 6 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1222 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated BambooHR and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Vendor Information. BambooHR stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Built for Teams stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
BambooHR provides hiring, onboarding, compensation administration, performance management and employee self-service capabilities to companies of all sizes and industries. Reviews suggest that it has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface. Employee self-service and a simplified onboarding experience are some noteworthy capabilities. The most repeated drawbacks include the absence of crucial functionality and the inability to customize report filters. Moreover, in-house payroll processing and management isn’t included. It can be a solid choice for companies willing to integrate with a third-party payroll provider.
Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...