Our analysts compared Azure Firewall vs Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Firewall Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Firewall Software
Is Azure Firewall a "blazing" fast solution for network security, or will it leave you "feeling the burn?" Azure Firewall is a highly regarded security solution that earns praise for its user-friendliness, scalability, and robust security features. Users particularly appreciate its seamless integration with other Azure services, making it a natural choice for organizations heavily invested in the Azure ecosystem. This tight integration allows for centralized management and consistent security policies across an organization's Azure resources. For instance, Azure Firewall can be easily configured to protect virtual networks, subnets, and even individual virtual machines from network threats. However, Azure Firewall is not without its drawbacks. Some users find its pricing structure, while based on a pay-as-you-go model, to be less competitive than alternatives like Fortinet FortiGate, especially for organizations with predictable network traffic patterns. This price difference can be significant for organizations operating on tight budgets or those with large and complex network infrastructures. In conclusion, Azure Firewall is an excellent choice for organizations deeply embedded in the Azure ecosystem, especially those prioritizing tight integration, ease of use, and robust security features. Its seamless integration with other Azure services simplifies management and enhances security posture. However, organizations sensitive to pricing or those seeking more competitive pricing models might find Fortinet FortiGate a more appealing option. Ultimately, the best choice depends on an organization's specific needs, priorities, and budget considerations.
Is Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual a firewall you can really count on, or does it leave you feeling burned? User reviews from the past year paint a somewhat mixed picture of this popular firewall solution. While many appreciate its robust security features and seamless integration with other Cisco products, some users have pointed out areas where it falls short. One of the most praised aspects of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual is its comprehensive threat protection. Users highlight its intrusion prevention system (IPS), URL filtering, and malware defense as being top-notch, providing a strong defense against a wide range of threats. The integration with Cisco Talos, which provides real-time threat intelligence, is also frequently commended for strengthening the firewall's security posture. Additionally, its VPN capabilities, including remote access and site-to-site VPN, are lauded for enabling secure remote work and inter-site connections. However, some users find that the management interface, particularly when accessed through a browser, can be cumbersome and prone to bugs. This can lead to frustration and inefficiency, especially for complex deployments. Overall, Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual appears to be a good choice for organizations heavily invested in the Cisco ecosystem, particularly those prioritizing tight integration and a familiar management experience. However, businesses looking for the most intuitive and feature-rich firewall solution might want to explore other options, as some aspects of its usability and performance have received criticism.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...