Our analysts compared Zuper vs Oracle Field Service based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Field Service Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Zuper is a comprehensive solution designed to streamline field service management (FSM) tasks. Most people working in this industry aren’t behind a desk from 9 to 5, with a variety of job sites, schedules and responsibilities, Zuper equips technicians with mobile capabilities.
It’s especially useful for industries like HVAC, plumbing and electrical services, where managing a remote workforce is key.
The software offers significant benefits, including enhanced productivity, improved customer satisfaction and optimized resource allocation.
Popular features of Zuper include real-time job tracking, a customer portal, automated scheduling and custom geofencing tags. These features help businesses manage their field operations more effectively by providing clear visibility into job statuses and workforce performance.
Users generally like Zuper’s customer support and implementation process. Customizable workflows make it easier to adapt. You can use the mobile app offline, so work doesn’t stop if you have an unexpected Wi-Fi outage. However, some users found reporting outdated, and the mobile app can have a learning curve.
Personally, I like the focus on bettering the customer experience with flexible payment options, ETA alerts, invoices that can be sent directly in a text and an outlet for them to provide feedback.
As for pricing, Zuper usually falls in the mid-range, depending on user numbers and required features. They offer flexible payment options, whether you prefer monthly or annual plans, so you can scale things up as your business grows.
According to their main website, they’ve saved users up to three hours per day. Let’s see how they do it! We’ve accessed their in-depth demo and combed through user reviews; check out our findings below.
among all Field Service Management Software
Zuper has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 137 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Oracle Field Service has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 80% when considering 332 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Zuper stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Oracle Field Service and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall Field Service Management Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Dispatching, Inventory Management, Mobile Capabilities and Routing.
Zuper is a comprehensive field service management solution that offers a detailed dashboard for effective oversight.While test-driving the demo, I initially thought the dashboard felt a bit overwhelming because there’s a lot of info in one place. However, while it may seem cluttered at first, it shows the details employees need without multiple tabs or spreadsheets (while also giving great transparency to managers).You can easily view your total jobs, with categories for in-progress, canceled, incomplete, completed and upcoming jobs.At the top of the dashboard, there's a customizable icon that allows you to select your desired date range and choose to view data for all teams or a specific one.To the right, you can monitor team availability, including total users, those on break, punched out for the day and those currently on the clock. Below this section, you'll find customer and coworker feedback represented by emojis, offering a quick snapshot of sentiments with options for happy, neutral, or unhappy responses.The left side of the dashboard displays the number of booked and scheduled jobs, and a pie chart illustrates job statuses at a glance for those who prefer visual data.The center of the dashboard highlights quote statuses like organized into drafts, accepted, declined, converted into invoices and awaiting responses. Below this, you'll find a summary of invoices categorized as pending, partially paid or paid.Additionally, the dashboard categorizes jobs by type, such as project management, manufacturing, installation services and residential services. You can quickly assess totals for new jobs, return visits, recurring tasks and one-off jobs.For managers, a leaderboard showcases employees based on the number of completed jobs.I felt like the job-creating process was straightforward and easy. Start by clicking the suitcase icon in the left-hand menu, which is the second option. This takes you to a list of all jobs, where you can see the job title, customer info, assigned employee or team, category, status and priority.To create a new job, click the "Create a New Job" button in the top right. You’ll be prompted to select either an existing customer or add a new one, after which you’ll proceed to enter job details. If you choose an existing client, their info—like address and phone number—will auto-populate.I liked that it shows the customer’s address on the map and connects right to Google Maps. On top of that, the estimates on how long a job will take are really helpful for planning out your day.Next, enter the job title, select its category and type, and choose a date and time slot. One thing that caught me off guard was the use of military time for the slots (like 18:30), but you'll get used to it quickly, and it won't slow you down.In the job details section, there's a text box for any specific information, such as access codes or special client requests, like “please don’t use the front door” or “park on the street.” You can also highlight important details to make sure they stand out. Next up, assign the job to yourself or another employee, then simply preview and save.What do users think of Zuper? Reading recent reviews, the consensus highlights its helpful and responsive implementation team. Most praise its automation features, integrations and scalability.In contrast, some users found the mobile app layout and settings menu difficult to navigate. One recent review also mentioned that time entry is limited to clocking in and out without adding specific minutes/hours for direct tasks.Zuper in ActionOverview:A popular furniture company that operates in over 60 countries struggled with delivery delays and negative installation experiences. They were losing revenue with a wave of frustrated customers.Challenges: Time consuming, manual scheduling and dispatching Lack of real-time visibility for deliveries Communication issues causing inconsistent information Human errors from handwritten service reports Scheduling conflicts and delaysSolutions: Streamlined job management for deliveries and installations Enabled real-time tracking Automated job assignments (with notes and customer details already included) Improved communication through centralized notificationsOverview:In another recent case study, a cleaning company in Austin was struggling with manual timesheets and paper processes, leading to inefficiencies and frequent payroll errors.Challenges: Payroll errors causing employee frustration and turnover Unable to accurately bill clients, resulting in revenue lossesSolutions: Automated time tracking for better accuracy Integrated invoicing based on actual hours worked at each client site
User reviews of Oracle Field Service reveal a spectrum of opinions, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses when compared to competitors like Salesforce Field Service Lightning and ServiceMax. One of its most lauded aspects is its remarkable scalability and flexibility, enabling businesses to adapt to evolving requirements and grow alongside the platform. As one user aptly stated, "Oracle Field Service played a crucial role in scaling our service operations as we entered new markets." This adaptability sets it apart from less versatile solutions, making it ideal for complex enterprises experiencing rapid growth. However, several users raised concerns about its steeper learning curve and higher cost compared to competitors. "The initial learning curve was definitely more challenging than we expected," commented a user during platform migration. This complexity, coupled with the cost, might not be ideal for smaller businesses or those with simpler needs. Another recurrent criticism targeted the complexity of the interface, which some users found overwhelming and difficult to navigate. This stood in stark contrast to competitors like Salesforce Field Service Lightning, known for its user-friendly interface. While the reporting capabilities met the needs of most users, some felt they lacked the depth and customization offered by ServiceMax. This could be a significant drawback for businesses requiring highly detailed service data insights. Overall, user reviews portray Oracle Field Service as a powerful and adaptable platform, ideal for large organizations seeking comprehensive field service management capabilities. While its complexity and cost might deter smaller businesses or those seeking a simpler solution, those comfortable with the initial learning curve will find in Oracle Field Service a robust platform with the potential to significantly enhance service operations and deliver a positive return on investment.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...