Our analysts compared Dataforma vs FieldAware based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Field Service Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Field Service Management Software
Dataforma has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 212 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
FieldAware has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 66% when considering 62 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Dataforma streamlines business operations, tracks projects, sets accountability and stores crucial information in one place. It provides tools that help users with billing, accounting and processing payroll. Its numerous filters and subcategories provide analytics and in-depth reporting into strengths and weaknesses for critical decision-making. The system is backed with efficient and prompt customer support and offers thorough training to new users. However, it offers many convoluted business management features that require lengthy back-end setup, has a clunky UI and doesn’t send notifications when duplicate data is entered. It is expensive for small businesses, has a steep learning curve and requires numerous steps to create sales correspondence.
Is FieldAware software really as keen as it seems in the field service management arena? User reviews from the past year reveal a mixed bag. On the upside, FieldAware consistently earns praise for its user-friendly interface, particularly for field technicians who find it intuitive and easy to navigate. This ease of use extends to features like scheduling, dispatching, and time tracking, streamlining daily operations for field teams. Users also appreciate the software's ability to improve back-office efficiency, citing faster invoicing and more detailed job records as key benefits. However, FieldAware isn't without its drawbacks. Some users point to limitations in reporting features, making it difficult to extract in-depth insights from their data. Occasional issues with customer support have also been reported, potentially hindering timely problem resolution. Moreover, FieldAware has been criticized for lacking certain advanced features found in competitors like ServiceTitan, such as automated customer communication tools. For instance, one user pointed out the absence of automatic text message notifications for customers when a technician is on the way. Overall, FieldAware appears best-suited for small to mid-sized businesses with mobile workforces seeking a user-friendly solution for managing core field service operations. Its strengths lie in its intuitive interface, efficient scheduling and dispatching capabilities, and seamless integration with other business software like QuickBooks. However, companies requiring robust reporting features or seeking more advanced automation capabilities might find FieldAware lacking and should explore alternative options.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...