Our analysts compared NetFacilities vs AkitaBox based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Facility Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Facility Management Software
NetFacilities has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 90% when considering 258 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
AkitaBox has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 92% when considering 26 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
NetFacilities stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
AkitaBox stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
NetFacilities offers a user-friendly interface, making many of its features accessible and easy to leverage. Customization, tracking and good customer service are some other notable benefits. Reviews also cite that easy submission and editing of work orders has helped them improve the process of creating and closing work orders. In contrast, the software is prone to freezing, crashing or unexpectedly logging users out. Poor report customization and a buggy search tool are other common issues users note. Overall, it can be a good option for businesses looking for an easy-to-use CMMS that helps with maintenance planning.
Recent user reviews suggest it might be the key to unlocking a more efficient and insightful approach to facility management. Users consistently praise AkitaBox for its user-friendly interface and robust functionality, particularly highlighting its Revit®-powered floor plans. This feature, as one user puts it, allows them to "quickly and easily import data about the assets" and visualize them in 3D, significantly improving efficiency. This strength is particularly crucial for facility managers dealing with numerous buildings and assets, as it provides a centralized and visually intuitive way to manage them. However, like an unkempt facility, AkitaBox has a few areas that need a little "sprucing up" according to some users. A recurring concern is the lack of comprehensive bulk editing for asset types. One user points out the inconvenience of having to add the same asset type multiple times across different buildings. While this doesn't negate the software's overall value, it does highlight a potential area for improvement. Another user expressed that the initial data configuration process was subpar, leading to inaccuracies and wasted time. This suggests that while the software itself is generally well-regarded, the implementation process might require more attention to detail and user involvement. Despite these minor drawbacks, the overwhelming sentiment is positive. Users rave about the software's impact on data accuracy, operational efficiency, and streamlined processes. The ability to track energy consumption, manage work orders, and access asset information remotely are just a few examples of how AkitaBox is simplifying facility management for its users. AkitaBox is best suited for facility management teams of all sizes, especially those in industries like healthcare and education, who are looking for a comprehensive, user-friendly solution to manage their buildings and assets effectively. Its strengths in visual asset management, data accuracy, and ease of use make it a powerful tool for optimizing facility operations and making informed decisions.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...