Our analysts compared AWS Glue vs Qlik Replicate based on data from our 400+ point analysis of ETL Tools, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution that enables real-time data integration between various data sources and target systems. It's ideal for organizations seeking to consolidate data from disparate sources, ensuring data consistency and availability for analytics and reporting purposes.
Key benefits include: real-time data replication, ensuring data accuracy and eliminating data latency; support for a wide range of data sources and target systems, providing flexibility in data integration; and robust data transformation capabilities, allowing for data cleansing, filtering, and enrichment before replication.
Qlik Replicate stands out with its user-friendly interface, intuitive drag-and-drop functionality, and comprehensive data monitoring and management tools. It offers flexible pricing options based on the number of data sources and target systems, making it cost-effective for organizations of all sizes.
among all ETL Tools
AWS Glue has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 165 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Qlik Replicate has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 100% when considering 2 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated AWS Glue and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Workflow Management.
Qlik Replicate stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
User reviews of AWS Glue paint a picture of a powerful and user-friendly ETL tool for the cloud, but one with limitations. Praise often centers around its intuitive visual interface, making complex data pipelines accessible even to non-programmers. Pre-built connectors and automated schema discovery further simplify setup, saving users time and effort. Glue's serverless nature and tight integration with the broader AWS ecosystem are also major draws, offering seamless scalability and data flow within a familiar environment. However, some users find Glue's strength in simplicity a double-edged sword. For complex transformations beyond basic filtering and aggregation, custom scripting in Python or Scala is required, limiting flexibility for those unfamiliar with these languages. On-premise data integration is another pain point, with Glue primarily catering to cloud-based sources. This leaves users seeking hybrid deployments or integration with legacy systems feeling somewhat stranded. Cost also arises as a concern. Glue's pay-per-use model can lead to unexpected bills for large data volumes or intricate pipelines, unlike some competitors offering fixed monthly subscriptions. Additionally, Glue's deep integration with AWS can create lock-in anxieties for users worried about switching cloud providers in the future. Overall, user reviews suggest Glue shines in cloud-based ETL for users comfortable with its visual interface and scripting limitations. Its scalability, ease of use, and AWS integration are undeniable strengths. However, for complex transformations, on-premise data needs, or cost-conscious users, alternative tools may offer a better fit.
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution that has received positive user reviews in the past year. Users appreciate its ease of use, reliability, and scalability. They also find it to be a cost-effective solution compared to similar products. One of the key strengths of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate data in real-time, which is essential for businesses that need to make decisions based on the most up-to-date information. Additionally, Qlik Replicate offers a variety of features that make it easy to manage and monitor replication tasks, such as a graphical user interface and a command-line interface. While Qlik Replicate is a powerful data replication solution, it does have some weaknesses. Some users have reported that it can be difficult to configure and that it can be slow to replicate large amounts of data. Additionally, Qlik Replicate does not offer some of the features that are available in more expensive data replication solutions, such as support for multiple data sources and the ability to replicate data over long distances. However, for businesses that need a reliable and cost-effective data replication solution, Qlik Replicate is a good option. Overall, Qlik Replicate is a good choice for businesses that need to replicate data in real-time. It is easy to use, reliable, and scalable. Additionally, it is a cost-effective solution compared to similar products. However, businesses that need to replicate large amounts of data or that need support for multiple data sources may want to consider a more expensive data replication solution.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...