Essbase vs Oracle EPM

Essbase is a multidimensional database with a fast querying engine and an intuitive interface. Available both in the cloud or on-premises, it enables users to build and manage analytic applications, which can be migrated to the cloud. It features a robust set of tools to perform planning, forecasting and analytics. Users can slice and dice intersections easily to find specific data. It can be integrated with Excel, enabling users to build budget and forecasting models, with ad hoc reporting capabilities. Users liked the flexibility offered when designing reports, or changing hierarchies. With access to all optimization and tuning options, users are given control of hardware utilizations and other settings. However, users complained that they needed to learn multiple languages, such as Calc scripts, MDX, business rules and Groovy, to leverage the platform’s capabilities. They also found it difficult to export data or integrate it with a data warehouse. Some users reported performance and stability issues, with rare instances of crashes and connection loss. Reviewers also complained about the low level of support provided when critical tickets are submitted, some of which are closed without providing any solution. Overall, it’s a flexible solution with a powerful calculation engine to drive business insights.

User reviews for Oracle EPM paint a mixed picture, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses. Many users praise its ability to automate tasks, streamline processes, and provide real-time insights, leading to improved efficiency and accuracy. They also value its ability to facilitate collaboration across departments and its centralized view of financial data, which fosters better decision-making. One user commented, "EPM has completely transformed our financial close process, reducing our closing time by 50%." Others appreciate how EPM helps them comply with complex regulations, with one user stating, "EPM has saved us countless hours and resources by automating our compliance reporting." However, some users find EPM's initial setup and configuration to be challenging and time-consuming. The cost can also be a barrier for smaller businesses. Additionally, the steep learning curve requires users to invest significant time and resources in training. Some users also expressed frustration with EPM's limited customization options and the challenges they faced integrating it with other systems. One user noted, "While EPM offers a lot of features, it can be inflexible at times and doesn't always meet our specific needs." Another user commented, "Integrating EPM with our existing ERP system was a major headache." When comparing EPM to similar products like SAP BPC and Anaplan, users often highlight EPM's comprehensive feature set, robust security measures, and seamless integration with other Oracle applications as its main differentiating factors. However, some users find SAP BPC to be more user-friendly and Anaplan to be more agile and adaptable. Ultimately, the best choice for individual users and businesses depends on their specific needs and priorities.