Essbase vs Jirav

Essbase is a multidimensional database with a fast querying engine and an intuitive interface. Available both in the cloud or on-premises, it enables users to build and manage analytic applications, which can be migrated to the cloud. It features a robust set of tools to perform planning, forecasting and analytics. Users can slice and dice intersections easily to find specific data. It can be integrated with Excel, enabling users to build budget and forecasting models, with ad hoc reporting capabilities. Users liked the flexibility offered when designing reports, or changing hierarchies. With access to all optimization and tuning options, users are given control of hardware utilizations and other settings. However, users complained that they needed to learn multiple languages, such as Calc scripts, MDX, business rules and Groovy, to leverage the platform’s capabilities. They also found it difficult to export data or integrate it with a data warehouse. Some users reported performance and stability issues, with rare instances of crashes and connection loss. Reviewers also complained about the low level of support provided when critical tickets are submitted, some of which are closed without providing any solution. Overall, it’s a flexible solution with a powerful calculation engine to drive business insights.

Is Jirav a jarring experience or a smooth ride for businesses seeking EPM solutions? User reviews from the past year suggest that Jirav is a user-friendly platform that excels in financial forecasting and reporting. Many users praise its intuitive interface, making it easy to navigate and find the features they need. They also highlight its robust reporting capabilities, allowing them to generate insightful financial reports with ease. For example, users have found Jirav particularly helpful in creating detailed cash flow forecasts and budget versus actual reports, providing valuable insights into their financial performance. However, some users have pointed out limitations in Jirav's workforce planning capabilities. While it offers basic features for managing employee data, it lacks the depth and sophistication found in dedicated HR management systems. For instance, Jirav may not be suitable for organizations with complex workforce planning needs, such as those requiring detailed skills tracking or succession planning. Overall, Jirav appears to be a strong contender in the EPM market, particularly for businesses that prioritize financial planning and reporting. Its user-friendly design and robust reporting features make it a valuable tool for finance teams. However, organizations with complex workforce planning requirements may need to consider alternative solutions.