Our analysts compared Lano vs Remote.com based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EOR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Lano is a sophisticated software solution designed to streamline global workforce management, particularly excelling in Employee of Record (EOR) services. It enables businesses to hire, onboard, and manage employees across multiple countries without the need for local entities. This makes it ideal for companies looking to expand internationally while minimizing administrative burdens and compliance risks.
Key benefits include simplified payroll processing, compliance with local labor laws, and efficient employee onboarding. Popular features encompass automated tax calculations, benefits administration, and real-time analytics, which provide valuable insights into workforce metrics. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and robust support, which facilitate seamless integration into existing HR systems.
Pricing details for Lano are not readily available, and it is recommended to contact SelectHub for a tailored quote based on specific business needs. This ensures that companies receive a pricing structure that aligns with their unique requirements and scale.
Remote is a comprehensive software solution designed to manage global employment tasks, including acting as an Employer of Record (EOR). This platform is particularly well-suited for companies looking to hire and manage international employees without establishing local entities. Remote simplifies compliance with local labor laws, payroll, benefits, and taxes, making it an ideal choice for businesses aiming to expand their global workforce efficiently.
Key benefits of using Remote include streamlined onboarding processes, automated payroll management, and robust compliance support. Popular features encompass global payroll, benefits administration, and legal compliance, ensuring that companies can focus on their core operations while Remote handles the complexities of international employment.
Compared to similar products, users often highlight Remote's user-friendly interface and comprehensive support as standout attributes. Pricing details can vary based on the number of employees and specific services required, so it's advisable to contact SelectHub for a tailored pricing quote that meets individual business needs.
among all EOR Software
Remote.com has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 7 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Is Lano the no-brainer solution for businesses seeking to expand their workforce globally without the usual growing pains? User reviews from the past year suggest that Lano's Employer of Record (EOR) service is a robust platform that excels in simplifying international hiring. Users rave about Lano's extensive global reach, encompassing over 170 countries, which eliminates the need for businesses to establish local legal entities, saving them considerable time and resources. A particularly compelling aspect is Lano's commitment to ensuring compliance with local labor laws, a factor often cited as a major pain point for businesses expanding internationally. However, some users have pointed out that while Lano offers extensive global coverage, its pricing structure can be complex and might not always be the most competitive, especially for businesses with smaller teams. Despite this, Lano's strengths lie in its user-friendly platform, praised for its intuitive design that requires minimal technical expertise to navigate. This ease of use extends to managing contracts, payroll, and benefits, streamlining otherwise complex HR processes. Lano seems to be a good fit for businesses, particularly startups and small to medium-sized enterprises, looking to tap into the global talent pool without the headache of navigating the complexities of international labor laws. Its intuitive platform, coupled with its comprehensive global coverage and focus on compliance, makes it a valuable tool for companies aiming to scale their operations internationally.
Is Remote.com the "remote control" for global hiring, or has it lost signal with its users? Recent reviews paint a mixed picture. While users have consistently praised the platform's user-friendly interface and comprehensive services, including robust payroll management and compliance support, a troubling trend has emerged in the past year. Users report a noticeable decline in service quality, particularly concerning customer support and billing accuracy. For instance, some have experienced double charges and accounting errors, leading to financial headaches. Additionally, concerns have been raised about unclear communication regarding changes in termination policies and potential legal risks. This shift in user sentiment is primarily attributed to a perceived decline in customer service quality and issues with billing and accounting. Users have reported frustrating experiences with the customer support team, citing difficulties in resolving complex issues due to language barriers and a lack of local knowledge among representatives. This decline in service quality, coupled with billing irregularities, has eroded user trust, making it difficult to wholeheartedly recommend Remote.com without reservations. Despite these drawbacks, Remote.com's intuitive platform and comprehensive suite of services make it a potentially viable option for businesses seeking to streamline their global hiring processes. However, companies should proceed with caution, carefully weighing the potential benefits against the reported risks. Thoroughly researching alternatives like Deel and Globalization Partners would be prudent to ensure they align with specific business needs and risk tolerance. Ultimately, Remote.com might be best suited for smaller businesses or those with less complex hiring needs who prioritize ease of use and are willing to accept potential trade-offs in customer service and billing accuracy.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...