Webroot Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business

Webroot Endpoint Protection has multi-layered threat protection that keeps your devices safe from common threats and more elaborate attacks. It is a non-intrusive suite that runs actively in the background to avoid disturbing the user. Overall, the performance of Webroot is positive, with reviewers constantly noting it scans quickly. Many reviewers have noted Webroot Endpoint can be annoying with blocking legitimate websites and false positive detections, but it does offer valuable, cost-effective services to its users, and would understandably make any serious SMB shortlist.

User reviews of Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business showcase a mix of strengths and weaknesses. One prominent strength lies in its robust threat protection capabilities. Users consistently praise its effectiveness in detecting and mitigating a wide array of cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. The centralized management console is another highlight, making security administration more straightforward by allowing policy configuration and monitoring from a single interface. Real-time updates for threat intelligence and antivirus signatures contribute to its strong security posture. However, there are notable weaknesses as well. Some users find the software resource-intensive, potentially causing performance issues on older hardware. The complexity of configuration can be overwhelming for IT administrators, particularly those with limited experience. Additionally, while Kaspersky generally maintains low false positives, occasional false detections can disrupt operations. The cost, compared to other solutions, is considered higher by some, which may be a drawback for smaller organizations. In comparison to similar products, Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business often stands out for its strong threat protection and centralized management. However, users stress the importance of ensuring compatibility with existing software and addressing the learning curve associated with its feature-rich interface. Overall, it is well-received for its security effectiveness but may require careful consideration of resources and costs.