Our analysts compared FortiClient vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Endpoint Security Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Endpoint Security Software
FortiClient has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 89% when considering 308 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
FortiClient provides its users with multilayered endpoint security for threat prevention. It provides real-time visibility of global software inventory and helps end users access internal networks from remote locations. Its cloud-delivered service is suitable for small and medium-sized businesses.
User reviews of Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business showcase a mix of strengths and weaknesses. One prominent strength lies in its robust threat protection capabilities. Users consistently praise its effectiveness in detecting and mitigating a wide array of cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. The centralized management console is another highlight, making security administration more straightforward by allowing policy configuration and monitoring from a single interface. Real-time updates for threat intelligence and antivirus signatures contribute to its strong security posture. However, there are notable weaknesses as well. Some users find the software resource-intensive, potentially causing performance issues on older hardware. The complexity of configuration can be overwhelming for IT administrators, particularly those with limited experience. Additionally, while Kaspersky generally maintains low false positives, occasional false detections can disrupt operations. The cost, compared to other solutions, is considered higher by some, which may be a drawback for smaller organizations. In comparison to similar products, Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business often stands out for its strong threat protection and centralized management. However, users stress the importance of ensuring compatibility with existing software and addressing the learning curve associated with its feature-rich interface. Overall, it is well-received for its security effectiveness but may require careful consideration of resources and costs.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...