Our analysts compared Cisco Secure Client vs eSentire based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Endpoint Security Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Endpoint Security Software
Cisco Secure Client has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 92% when considering 901 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
eSentire has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 46 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Cisco Secure Client stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
eSentire stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
How do you ensure your clients aren't left out in the cold when it comes to endpoint security? Cisco Secure Client is a popular choice for endpoint security, garnering generally positive reviews from users. Its strengths lie in its robust threat detection capabilities, which users praise for effectively neutralizing threats quickly. The software also boasts cross-platform compatibility, a significant advantage in today's diverse technological landscape, as it supports Windows, Mac, and Linux systems, as well as Android and iOS devices. However, some users have reported performance issues, particularly on Linux systems, which could be a drawback for businesses heavily reliant on this operating system. One of the critical differentiating factors of Cisco Secure Client is its use of AI for threat detection. Unlike traditional methods that rely solely on signature detection, Cisco's approach allows it to identify and block threats based on their behavior, making it more effective against zero-day exploits and sophisticated attacks. This proactive approach to security is essential in today's threat landscape, where new and unknown threats emerge constantly. However, a significant downside is the lack of transparent pricing information. Potential customers are required to contact Cisco directly for quotes, which can be inconvenient and time-consuming. Overall, Cisco Secure Client is best suited for medium to large-sized businesses that require comprehensive endpoint protection and prioritize robust threat detection. Its advanced features, such as AI-powered threat detection and cross-platform compatibility, make it a powerful tool against evolving cyber threats. However, businesses heavily reliant on Linux systems might want to consider the reported performance issues. The lack of transparent pricing could also be a deterrent for some.
While eSentire offers a comprehensive suite of security features, including endpoint protection, vulnerability management, and threat intelligence, it appears to be most celebrated for its Managed Detection and Response (MDR) capabilities. Users consistently highlight the responsiveness and expertise of eSentire's security analysts, who actively monitor and respond to threats, providing a sense of security and peace of mind. This is particularly valuable for organizations that lack the internal resources or expertise to effectively manage their own security operations. However, some users have expressed concerns about the platform's complexity and the learning curve associated with its implementation and use. Additionally, while eSentire's MDR services are highly regarded, they come at a premium price point, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations with limited budgets. This is where considering alternative solutions like CrowdStrike or SentinelOne might be beneficial, as they offer competitive endpoint security features at potentially more accessible price points. Ultimately, eSentire appears to be best suited for mid-sized to large enterprises that prioritize a high level of security and are willing to invest in a premium MDR solution with proactive threat hunting and response capabilities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...