Acunetix vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

User reviews from the past year suggest that Acunetix, developed by Invicti, is a well-regarded tool for managing endpoint security, penetration testing, and website security. Users have praised its comprehensive vulnerability scanning capabilities, highlighting its ability to detect a wide range of threats, including SQL injection and cross-site scripting. One user commended Acunetix for its "good OWASP scans and reports and automation," emphasizing its effectiveness in identifying and addressing security risks. Another user lauded its user-friendliness, stating that it "makes me feel a part of the test." However, some users have pointed out limitations. One criticism targets the licensing model, with a user describing it as "the worst I have ever used" due to its inflexibility in reallocating target URLs. Another user cautioned against relying solely on Acunetix, noting that "some vulnerabilities still can't be detected" and recommending manual vulnerability assessments as a supplementary measure. Despite these drawbacks, Acunetix is generally viewed favorably by users, who appreciate its robust features, accuracy, and ease of use. Acunetix appears to be a suitable choice for organizations of all sizes that prioritize web application security. Its comprehensive scanning, automation features, and integration capabilities make it a valuable asset for security professionals and developers alike. However, potential users should carefully consider the licensing model and the need for manual vulnerability assessments to ensure it aligns with their specific requirements and risk tolerance.

User reviews for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reflect a mix of strengths and weaknesses. Users consistently praise its robust threat protection capabilities, including effective malware and phishing attack detection. The user-friendly interface and centralized cloud-based management are commonly appreciated, making it accessible and convenient for administrators. The solution's quick threat detection and response, along with seamless integration between endpoint and email security, receive positive feedback for enhancing overall security. On the downside, some users find the product to be resource-intensive, potentially affecting system performance on older devices. Complex initial configuration and potential compatibility issues with third-party software are reported challenges. Cost is cited as a drawback for smaller organizations with limited budgets. While the automation features are well-received, the product may occasionally generate false positives, requiring manual intervention. Users generally view Symantec Endpoint Security Complete favorably when compared to similar products, particularly due to its comprehensive threat protection and integration capabilities. However, some mention limitations in mobile device support and the need for careful policy adjustment to avoid impacting user experience. The product's commitment to compliance support and 24/7 threat monitoring and support also contribute positively to user satisfaction.