Our analysts compared Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Practice Fusion is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline electronic health records (EHR) management and other essential tasks for healthcare providers. It is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized medical practices due to its user-friendly interface and robust functionality. The software offers significant benefits, including improved patient care coordination, enhanced data accuracy, and efficient workflow management.
Popular features of Practice Fusion include customizable charting, e-prescribing, patient scheduling, and billing integration. Users often appreciate its intuitive design and the ability to access patient information quickly and securely. Compared to similar products, Practice Fusion is frequently praised for its ease of use and affordability, making it an attractive option for practices with limited resources.
Pricing for Practice Fusion typically falls within a moderate range, often based on a per-provider, per-month model, which allows for predictable budgeting. This payment structure ensures that practices can scale their usage according to their needs without incurring prohibitive costs.
among all EHR Software
Practice Fusion has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 461 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
eClinicalWorks has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 68% when considering 523 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
User reviews from the past year paint a mixed picture. While some users praise its intuitive design and comprehensive features, others express frustration with its customer support and pricing. Practice Fusion stands out for its user-friendly interface, which makes navigating the system a breeze, especially for those new to electronic health records. Its robust feature set, including charting, e-prescribing, and billing, caters to a wide range of practice needs. However, some users report encountering difficulties with customer support, finding it unresponsive and unhelpful. Additionally, pricing concerns have been raised, with some users finding the system expensive compared to competitors like Athenahealth or Kareo. Overall, Practice Fusion seems best suited for smaller practices seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one EHR solution. However, practices with more complex needs or those prioritizing responsive customer support might want to explore alternative options.
The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...