Our analysts compared Practice Fusion vs athenaOne based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Practice Fusion is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline electronic health records (EHR) management and other essential tasks for healthcare providers. It is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized medical practices due to its user-friendly interface and robust functionality. The software offers significant benefits, including improved patient care coordination, enhanced data accuracy, and efficient workflow management.
Popular features of Practice Fusion include customizable charting, e-prescribing, patient scheduling, and billing integration. Users often appreciate its intuitive design and the ability to access patient information quickly and securely. Compared to similar products, Practice Fusion is frequently praised for its ease of use and affordability, making it an attractive option for practices with limited resources.
Pricing for Practice Fusion typically falls within a moderate range, often based on a per-provider, per-month model, which allows for predictable budgeting. This payment structure ensures that practices can scale their usage according to their needs without incurring prohibitive costs.
among all EHR Software
Practice Fusion has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 461 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
athenaOne has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 76% when considering 953 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated athenaOne and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Integration and Extensibility.
User reviews from the past year paint a mixed picture. While some users praise its intuitive design and comprehensive features, others express frustration with its customer support and pricing. Practice Fusion stands out for its user-friendly interface, which makes navigating the system a breeze, especially for those new to electronic health records. Its robust feature set, including charting, e-prescribing, and billing, caters to a wide range of practice needs. However, some users report encountering difficulties with customer support, finding it unresponsive and unhelpful. Additionally, pricing concerns have been raised, with some users finding the system expensive compared to competitors like Athenahealth or Kareo. Overall, Practice Fusion seems best suited for smaller practices seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one EHR solution. However, practices with more complex needs or those prioritizing responsive customer support might want to explore alternative options.
Athena offers robust functionalities that streamline many daily tasks for care providers. Many users felt that the system offered all of the functionalities they were looking for and felt that the interface was easy to navigate and did not experience system downtime. Users also felt that customer support was able to address most of their concerns at a satisfactory level. However, some users felt that the claims functionality was unsatisfactory and recognized that the system couldn’t make their desired customizations. Users also noticed inaccuracies in their data, but many were unable to determine if this was a result of the system storing information incorrectly or the result of users experiencing difficulty navigating the platform. The high price of this system may be cost prohibitive as this system is best suited for smaller practices that won’t need to provide multiple care providers with access to the system.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...