Top Oracle Ambulatory EHR Alternatives & Competitors For 2024

Cerner Ambulatory EHR really shines when it comes to digitizing outpatient care and making clinical workflows smoother. The software is packed with features that cater specifically to ambulatory settings like charting, digital patient intake and lab integration.It’s particularly strong in clinical documentation, scoring top marks compared to competitors like AdvancedMD and eClinicalWorks. This means it’s well-equipped for handling tasks like scanning paper records into digital files, electronically signing documents, and tracking immunizations and diet plans. So, if you’re looking for a solution to streamline administrative tasks and reduce paperwork, the system has you covered.The solution is also pretty flexible in terms of customization. You can adapt templates and workflows to fit your practice’s specific needs, though if you want to go all-in with customization, you might need some help from Cerner’s support team. It’s something to keep in mind, especially for clinics that don’t have a lot of IT resources.Where the product really sets itself apart is in mobile accessibility. You can send messages, access patient data offline and even dictate notes with speech-to-text, all from your mobile device. The score for mobile features is notably higher than competitors like athenahealth, making it a solid choice for practices that need remote access.When it comes to interoperability — basically, how well the software plays with other systems — it’s pretty advanced. It complies with major standards like HL7 and FHIR, which are essential for sharing data with other EHRs.However, it’s not all smooth sailing. The learning curve could be steep, which isn’t uncommon for EHR systems, but it’s something to be aware of if your team isn’t tech-savvy.Plus, you might also experience occasional performance issues like slow loading times or system glitches, which could disrupt daily operations.In a nutshell, Cerner Ambulatory EHR is a great fit for practices looking to digitize and automate their workflows, especially those that prioritize mobile accessibility and data security. Just be prepared for a bit of a learning curve and some investment upfront to get the most out of it.

The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.

NueMD is a cloud-based practice management software that offers a suite of features, including medical billing, electronic health records (EHR), and appointment scheduling. While NueMD has been a popular choice for some practices, user reviews from the past year suggest that it may not be the best fit for everyone. One of the biggest strengths of NueMD is its comprehensive suite of features. Users praise the software's ability to handle everything from billing to scheduling, making it a one-stop shop for practice management. However, some users have expressed concerns about the software's user interface, which they find clunky and difficult to navigate. They also complain that the software is not as intuitive as other EHR systems on the market, such as Athenahealth or Kareo. NueMD's customer support has also been a point of contention, with some users reporting long wait times and unhelpful responses. NueMD's biggest differentiator is its focus on medical billing. The software's billing features are highly regarded by users, who appreciate its ability to streamline the billing process and reduce the number of errors. However, NueMD's billing features are not without their drawbacks. Some users have reported that the software's billing system is not as flexible as other systems on the market, making it difficult to customize for specific practice needs. Overall, NueMD is a solid EHR system that offers a comprehensive suite of features. However, its clunky user interface, lack of intuitive design, and inconsistent customer support may make it a less desirable option for some practices. NueMD is best suited for practices that are looking for a system with strong billing features and are willing to put in the time and effort to learn the software. It is important to note that AdvancedMD, the company behind NueMD, is sunsetting the software in 2025. This means that practices using NueMD will need to migrate to a different system in the near future.

AdvancedMD is an intuitive cloud-based tool. While some users were happy with the system’s integration and customization capabilities, far more users were extremely dissatisfied with other aspects of the system. There were mixed reviews on its reporting capabilities. A significant number of reviewers felt that the sales representatives misled customers noting that they lost money after implementing AdvancedMD and commenting that many features lacked the functionality that they required. Though the add-ons allow users to customize the system, many users complained that the add-ons come at a steep price, making them prohibitive to many users. Users also complained that they were surprised by hidden fees after implementation and felt that customer service was rude and unwilling to help when they called for support. A small number of reviews also noted that upgrades to the system frequently caused downtime and reported discrepancies in their billing that affected customers. While many of the reviews were negative, AdvancedMD remains a popular EHR solution. Due to its high price and difficulty to learn, it is best suited to large practices with the budget for necessary add-ons and internal technical support that is available to help ensure everyone who needs to can use the system.

User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.