Looking for alternatives to Nextech? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Clinical Charts, Clinical Documentation, and Platform Security and Compliance. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real EHR Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Nextech to leading industry alternatives like NextGen Enterprise, eClinicalWorks, NueMD, and AdvancedMD.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
NextGen Enterprise helps multi- and single-specialty practices handle clinical and administrative tasks like appointment scheduling and revenue management. It provides practice management, charting, telehealth, a patient portal and analytics tools.
Its comprehensive features, specialty-specific content and scalable design make it a valuable asset for practices seeking to enhance their operational efficiency and improve patient outcomes.
Potential users should be aware of the initial setup and learning curve associated with implementation. Additionally, it doesn’t provide robust integrative capabilities.
Pricing is based on a subscription model, with costs varying depending on the practice size, number of users and specific features selected.
To explore other popular solutions that NextGen Enterprise offers, visit our NextGen Enterprise company page.
NueMD is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline various administrative and clinical tasks for healthcare providers. It excels in managing electronic health records (EHR), medical billing, and practice management. This software is particularly well-suited for small to mid-sized medical practices, as it offers an intuitive interface and robust functionality that can handle the complexities of healthcare administration without overwhelming users.
One of the key benefits of NueMD is its ability to improve workflow efficiency, thereby allowing healthcare professionals to focus more on patient care. Popular features include customizable templates, real-time claim tracking, and integrated scheduling. Users often highlight its ease of use and the quality of customer support as significant advantages.
In terms of pricing, NueMD typically operates on a subscription model, with costs varying based on the number of users and specific features required. This makes it a flexible option for practices of different sizes and needs. Compared to similar products, NueMD is frequently praised for its user-friendly design and comprehensive feature set, making it a strong contender in the EHR market.
among all EHR Software
Nextech has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 79% when considering 318 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
NextGen Enterprise has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 79% when considering 1475 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
eClinicalWorks has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 68% when considering 523 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
NueMD has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 485 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
AdvancedMD has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 452 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Nextech, a comprehensive practice management solution designed to streamline workflows for specialty practices, has elicited a range of feedback from users over the past year. While opinions on the platform's efficacy vary, several recurring themes emerge from user reviews, shedding light on its strengths, weaknesses, and ideal user base. Nextech's robust features and customizability are frequently cited as major advantages. Users appreciate the platform's ability to adapt to the specific needs of different specialties, with tools for appointment scheduling, billing, and electronic health records (EHR) management. The platform's integration with other software systems is also highlighted as a strength, enabling seamless data exchange and reducing manual data entry. However, some users find the extensive customization options overwhelming, leading to a steep learning curve and implementation challenges. Nextech's EHR functionality receives mixed reviews. Some users praise its comprehensive features, such as charting, e-prescribing, and patient portal access. Others express concerns about the EHR's user interface, citing issues with navigation and data entry. Additionally, while Nextech offers a mobile app, its functionality is limited compared to the desktop version, which can be inconvenient for users who require on-the-go access. In comparison to similar products, Nextech stands out for its specialization in serving the needs of specialty practices. Its features and workflows are tailored to address the unique challenges faced by these practices, such as complex billing requirements and specialized clinical documentation. This focus on specialty practices differentiates Nextech from more generic practice management solutions. Considering its strengths and weaknesses, Nextech appears best suited for larger specialty practices with dedicated IT resources and a willingness to invest time in implementation and training. The platform's extensive features and customizability can provide significant value to these practices, but may overwhelm smaller practices with limited resources.
Our research analysts, after evaluating several solutions, awarded NextGen Enterprise with best-in-class honors for Insurance Payments Management, Medical Coding, Medical Billing Services, Notes and Templates, and Deployment Options.NextGen Enterprise provides EHR, practice management and patient experiene modules that support 2000 workflows and content for 30 specialties including cardiology, dental health, neurology, primary care and more.Intutive EHR tools make it easy for doctors and nurses to document patient visits. You can even use AI for note-taking. And with the mobile app, you can access patient info and chart on the go.The platform really shines when it comes to practice management. It automates a ton of time-consuming tasks like eligibility verification and billing, so your staff can focus on what really matters: patient care. Plus, the built-in analytics give practices valuable insights to improve efficiency and, ultimately, the bottom line.Patient engagement is also a key focus, with the NextGen PxP patient portal empowering patients to actively participate in their healthcare journey. They can schedule appointments, request refills, view test results and even message their doctors securely.One area that the system lacked was its integrative capabilities. It scored 77 in our analysis, lower than other popular products like athenahealth (93) and Cerner Ambulatory (88). That means you will need to connect barcode scanners, clinical decision support tools, prescription management systems and others via API.
The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.
NueMD is a cloud-based practice management software that offers a suite of features, including medical billing, electronic health records (EHR), and appointment scheduling. While NueMD has been a popular choice for some practices, user reviews from the past year suggest that it may not be the best fit for everyone. One of the biggest strengths of NueMD is its comprehensive suite of features. Users praise the software's ability to handle everything from billing to scheduling, making it a one-stop shop for practice management. However, some users have expressed concerns about the software's user interface, which they find clunky and difficult to navigate. They also complain that the software is not as intuitive as other EHR systems on the market, such as Athenahealth or Kareo. NueMD's customer support has also been a point of contention, with some users reporting long wait times and unhelpful responses. NueMD's biggest differentiator is its focus on medical billing. The software's billing features are highly regarded by users, who appreciate its ability to streamline the billing process and reduce the number of errors. However, NueMD's billing features are not without their drawbacks. Some users have reported that the software's billing system is not as flexible as other systems on the market, making it difficult to customize for specific practice needs. Overall, NueMD is a solid EHR system that offers a comprehensive suite of features. However, its clunky user interface, lack of intuitive design, and inconsistent customer support may make it a less desirable option for some practices. NueMD is best suited for practices that are looking for a system with strong billing features and are willing to put in the time and effort to learn the software. It is important to note that AdvancedMD, the company behind NueMD, is sunsetting the software in 2025. This means that practices using NueMD will need to migrate to a different system in the near future.
AdvancedMD is an intuitive cloud-based tool. While some users were happy with the system’s integration and customization capabilities, far more users were extremely dissatisfied with other aspects of the system. There were mixed reviews on its reporting capabilities. A significant number of reviewers felt that the sales representatives misled customers noting that they lost money after implementing AdvancedMD and commenting that many features lacked the functionality that they required. Though the add-ons allow users to customize the system, many users complained that the add-ons come at a steep price, making them prohibitive to many users. Users also complained that they were surprised by hidden fees after implementation and felt that customer service was rude and unwilling to help when they called for support. A small number of reviews also noted that upgrades to the system frequently caused downtime and reported discrepancies in their billing that affected customers. While many of the reviews were negative, AdvancedMD remains a popular EHR solution. Due to its high price and difficulty to learn, it is best suited to large practices with the budget for necessary add-ons and internal technical support that is available to help ensure everyone who needs to can use the system.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...