Nextech vs eClinicalWorks

Nextech, a comprehensive practice management solution designed to streamline workflows for specialty practices, has elicited a range of feedback from users over the past year. While opinions on the platform's efficacy vary, several recurring themes emerge from user reviews, shedding light on its strengths, weaknesses, and ideal user base. Nextech's robust features and customizability are frequently cited as major advantages. Users appreciate the platform's ability to adapt to the specific needs of different specialties, with tools for appointment scheduling, billing, and electronic health records (EHR) management. The platform's integration with other software systems is also highlighted as a strength, enabling seamless data exchange and reducing manual data entry. However, some users find the extensive customization options overwhelming, leading to a steep learning curve and implementation challenges. Nextech's EHR functionality receives mixed reviews. Some users praise its comprehensive features, such as charting, e-prescribing, and patient portal access. Others express concerns about the EHR's user interface, citing issues with navigation and data entry. Additionally, while Nextech offers a mobile app, its functionality is limited compared to the desktop version, which can be inconvenient for users who require on-the-go access. In comparison to similar products, Nextech stands out for its specialization in serving the needs of specialty practices. Its features and workflows are tailored to address the unique challenges faced by these practices, such as complex billing requirements and specialized clinical documentation. This focus on specialty practices differentiates Nextech from more generic practice management solutions. Considering its strengths and weaknesses, Nextech appears best suited for larger specialty practices with dedicated IT resources and a willingness to invest time in implementation and training. The platform's extensive features and customizability can provide significant value to these practices, but may overwhelm smaller practices with limited resources.

The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.