Our analysts compared Meditech vs athenaOne based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EHR Software
Meditech has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 63% when considering 154 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
athenaOne has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 76% when considering 953 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Meditech and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Clinical Documentation.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated athenaOne and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Integration and Extensibility.
Meditech is an intuitive EHR solution to streamline charting, documentation and patient data retrieval. Reviewers found the system simplified to a fault. Users found that it helps keep information neatly and securely organized, resulting in a smooth user experience. Without overwhelming clients, the platform enables ease of use and navigation. It also increases treatment accuracy by predicting diagnosis. However, others complained that its lack of features limited its functionality. It provides minimal charting options. It also lacks an assessment entry field, dot phase or auto-populate preset features. Its notifications are easy to miss. Being a web-based application, it’s not optimized for smartphones or mobile devices. The system can lag when dealing with high volumes. Overall, it’s not a comprehensive solution, but it streamlines clinical workflows with its suite of features.
Athena offers robust functionalities that streamline many daily tasks for care providers. Many users felt that the system offered all of the functionalities they were looking for and felt that the interface was easy to navigate and did not experience system downtime. Users also felt that customer support was able to address most of their concerns at a satisfactory level. However, some users felt that the claims functionality was unsatisfactory and recognized that the system couldn’t make their desired customizations. Users also noticed inaccuracies in their data, but many were unable to determine if this was a result of the system storing information incorrectly or the result of users experiencing difficulty navigating the platform. The high price of this system may be cost prohibitive as this system is best suited for smaller practices that won’t need to provide multiple care providers with access to the system.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...