Looking for alternatives to Meditech Expanse? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Clinical Charts, Clinical Documentation, and Platform Security and Compliance. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real EHR Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Meditech Expanse to leading industry alternatives like athenaClinicals, NextGen Enterprise, Practice Fusion, and eMDs.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
NextGen Enterprise helps multi- and single-specialty practices handle clinical and administrative tasks like appointment scheduling and revenue management. It provides practice management, charting, telehealth, a patient portal and analytics tools.
Its comprehensive features, specialty-specific content and scalable design make it a valuable asset for practices seeking to enhance their operational efficiency and improve patient outcomes.
Potential users should be aware of the initial setup and learning curve associated with implementation. Additionally, it doesn’t provide robust integrative capabilities.
Pricing is based on a subscription model, with costs varying depending on the practice size, number of users and specific features selected.
To explore other popular solutions that NextGen Enterprise offers, visit our NextGen Enterprise company page.
Practice Fusion is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline electronic health records (EHR) management and other essential tasks for healthcare providers. It is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized medical practices due to its user-friendly interface and robust functionality. The software offers significant benefits, including improved patient care coordination, enhanced data accuracy, and efficient workflow management.
Popular features of Practice Fusion include customizable charting, e-prescribing, patient scheduling, and billing integration. Users often appreciate its intuitive design and the ability to access patient information quickly and securely. Compared to similar products, Practice Fusion is frequently praised for its ease of use and affordability, making it an attractive option for practices with limited resources.
Pricing for Practice Fusion typically falls within a moderate range, often based on a per-provider, per-month model, which allows for predictable budgeting. This payment structure ensures that practices can scale their usage according to their needs without incurring prohibitive costs.
among all EHR Software
athenaClinicals has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 76% when considering 815 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
NextGen Enterprise has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 79% when considering 1475 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Practice Fusion has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 461 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
eMDs has a 'poor' User Satisfaction Rating of 51% when considering 39 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Is Meditech Expanse really so expansive that it pushes the boundaries of what an EHR can be? While Meditech Expanse has garnered a devoted following, a deeper dive into user experiences over the past year reveals a mixed bag, particularly when compared to its rivals. Users consistently applaud Meditech Expanse for its user-friendly interface, often drawing comparisons to navigating a streamlined website. This ease of use, coupled with its reputation for robust customer service, makes it particularly appealing to healthcare facilities transitioning from older systems or seeking a less daunting technological leap. However, a recurring gripe amongst users is the lack of transparency in pricing. This opacity surrounding costs, often involving hidden fees for data migration and customization, leaves a bitter aftertaste, especially for smaller practices working with tight budgets. Furthermore, while Expanse boasts interoperability, some users find its customization options, particularly in specialized fields like mental health, to be somewhat lacking compared to competitors like Epic, which offers more tailored solutions. In essence, Meditech Expanse is like a reliable but aging car – it gets you where you need to go, but it may lack the bells and whistles of newer models. Its strengths lie in its user-friendliness, dependable customer support, and robust interoperability features, making it a solid choice for hospitals and practices prioritizing ease of implementation and use. However, its opaque pricing structure and limitations in advanced features might give larger institutions or those with niche requirements pause.
AthenaClinicals is a cloud-based EHR software known for its robust features and intuitive interface, but user reviews over the past year have been a mixed bag. A standout feature is its comprehensive patient portal, athenaCommunicator, which empowers patients to schedule appointments, view health records, and communicate securely with providers. This not only enhances patient engagement but also streamlines administrative tasks for practices. Another strength is athenaClinicals' integration with a vast network of healthcare providers, athenaNet, facilitating seamless data exchange and care coordination. This interoperability is crucial in today's healthcare landscape, allowing providers to access a more complete patient history and make informed decisions. However, some users have reported that the software can be clunky and difficult to navigate, particularly for those unfamiliar with EHR systems. Additionally, while athenaClinicals offers extensive reporting capabilities, some users have found the sheer volume of data overwhelming and difficult to interpret without dedicated support. Overall, athenaClinicals is best suited for practices seeking a feature-rich EHR solution with a strong emphasis on patient engagement and care coordination. Its robust patient portal and integration with a vast provider network make it an excellent choice for practices looking to streamline workflows and improve communication. However, practices with limited technical expertise or those overwhelmed by extensive data analysis might find athenaClinicals less user-friendly and may require additional support to fully utilize its capabilities.
Our research analysts, after evaluating several solutions, awarded NextGen Enterprise with best-in-class honors for Insurance Payments Management, Medical Coding, Medical Billing Services, Notes and Templates, and Deployment Options.NextGen Enterprise provides EHR, practice management and patient experiene modules that support 2000 workflows and content for 30 specialties including cardiology, dental health, neurology, primary care and more.Intutive EHR tools make it easy for doctors and nurses to document patient visits. You can even use AI for note-taking. And with the mobile app, you can access patient info and chart on the go.The platform really shines when it comes to practice management. It automates a ton of time-consuming tasks like eligibility verification and billing, so your staff can focus on what really matters: patient care. Plus, the built-in analytics give practices valuable insights to improve efficiency and, ultimately, the bottom line.Patient engagement is also a key focus, with the NextGen PxP patient portal empowering patients to actively participate in their healthcare journey. They can schedule appointments, request refills, view test results and even message their doctors securely.One area that the system lacked was its integrative capabilities. It scored 77 in our analysis, lower than other popular products like athenahealth (93) and Cerner Ambulatory (88). That means you will need to connect barcode scanners, clinical decision support tools, prescription management systems and others via API.
User reviews from the past year paint a mixed picture. While some users praise its intuitive design and comprehensive features, others express frustration with its customer support and pricing. Practice Fusion stands out for its user-friendly interface, which makes navigating the system a breeze, especially for those new to electronic health records. Its robust feature set, including charting, e-prescribing, and billing, caters to a wide range of practice needs. However, some users report encountering difficulties with customer support, finding it unresponsive and unhelpful. Additionally, pricing concerns have been raised, with some users finding the system expensive compared to competitors like Athenahealth or Kareo. Overall, Practice Fusion seems best suited for smaller practices seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one EHR solution. However, practices with more complex needs or those prioritizing responsive customer support might want to explore alternative options.
Reviews from the past year highlight both the good and the not-so-good, giving us a clear picture of where eMDs shines and where it falls short. Users rave about its user-friendly interface, especially for scheduling and charting, making it a breeze for healthcare pros to navigate. The robust reporting features are another big plus, allowing for easy data analysis and informed decision-making. However, eMDs isn't without its quirks. Some users find the system a bit clunky and report occasional glitches and slowdowns. Plus, the customer support experience seems to be a mixed bag, with some users praising its responsiveness while others find it lacking. So, who's the ideal candidate for eMDs? It seems to be a good fit for small to medium-sized practices looking for a user-friendly EHR with solid reporting capabilities. But, if top-notch customer support and a seamless, glitch-free experience are your top priorities, you might want to explore other options. Keep in mind, the tech world is always evolving, so it's a good idea to check out the latest reviews and updates before making your final decision.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...