Our analysts compared EHR 24/7 vs athenaOne based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EHR Software
athenaOne has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 76% when considering 953 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated athenaOne and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Integration and Extensibility.
Is EHR 24/7 all it's cracked up to be? User reviews from the past year suggest it's a reliable option for practices seeking to streamline their electronic health record management. Users rave about its intuitive interface and comprehensive features, particularly its robust patient record management and reporting tools. The system's seamless integration with other healthcare systems is another major plus, saving practices time and reducing errors. However, some users have reported occasional system slowdowns and a learning curve for new users. While customer support generally receives positive feedback, some users have experienced delayed response times during peak periods. EHR 24/7's ability to customize workflows, enhance clinical workflows, and provide secure communication make it a strong contender in the EHR market. These features are critical for practices aiming to optimize productivity, improve patient care coordination, and ensure data security. Overall, EHR 24/7 appears to be a good fit for practices of all sizes looking for a user-friendly and feature-rich EHR system, particularly those already familiar with Office Ally's suite of healthcare solutions.
Athena offers robust functionalities that streamline many daily tasks for care providers. Many users felt that the system offered all of the functionalities they were looking for and felt that the interface was easy to navigate and did not experience system downtime. Users also felt that customer support was able to address most of their concerns at a satisfactory level. However, some users felt that the claims functionality was unsatisfactory and recognized that the system couldn’t make their desired customizations. Users also noticed inaccuracies in their data, but many were unable to determine if this was a result of the system storing information incorrectly or the result of users experiencing difficulty navigating the platform. The high price of this system may be cost prohibitive as this system is best suited for smaller practices that won’t need to provide multiple care providers with access to the system.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...